The Big Question about Obamacare 
Saturday, March 31, 2012 at 7:46PM
D.K. Dickey in Big Labor Unions, Govt. Nanny State, Govt. Programs & Regulations, Healthcare Issues, National I.D. Cards, Obama 2012 Campaign, Obama Administration, Obama Defeated at Polls, Obama Policies, ObamaCare, Obamacare, Opinions & Ideas, Progressive Liberal Programs, Social Security Issues, Socialist Programs, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Presidential Elections, Voter Laws, Voter Laws

 

Recently a number of states have moved forward with changes to their election laws designed to minimize the possibility of voter fraud in the upcoming Presidential Election. These include the abolition of same-day registration and the requirement that voters show a photo ID before being allowed to cast a ballot.

The Obama administration and Attorney General Eric Holder has staked out a position in opposition, telling the state of Texas, for example, that its new voter I.D. law is unconstitutional because it discriminates against Hispanics, African-Americans, the elderly, and others.

The Big Question: 

If an individual's photo I.D. is not required to vote for Obama and the Senators that voted for Obamacare, then why is one required to have a positive Photo I.D. with a residence address and a Federally Issued Social Security Number under the Obamacare Program for any hospital admissions and Doctors visits?

This Obamacare is discriminatory and has prejudicial profiling requirement that puts a burden on some citizens in our nation to carry social security cards and photo I.D.s.  Shouldn't anyone just take the patient's word on who they are and where they live and just give out free medical care?

Can Barack Obama and Eric Holder answer that? 

 

~  REMEMBER... 

 VOTE 2012!  ~

 

Article originally appeared on My Oval Office (http://www.rovalocity.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.