We Fought Muslims 230 Years Ago??

Today, public information is being pushed by fear instead of by actual facts. The Middle East Muslim dilemma is rife with PC misinformation. By Obama catering to public ignorance it is easy to manipulate Americans into drawing the PC, 'Politically Correct' decisions to reach the politically left-wing endorsed conclusions for restraining U.S. combat protocols deployed.  

The current Middle East strategy debate to send in U.S. ground troops is hanging tenuously in the balance to tip the scales of war in our favor. Since the Middle East wars have exploded much further in recent years under the Obama administration, many U.S. politicians urge caution and restraint into entering any further military engagements within sovereign regional boundaries; especially since it was noted that this would be a historically unparalleled aggression not done in that Islamic region of the world which would cause further retaliation. It sounds good, but is it? ...A Big No!

Get appreciation & perspective of real figures, facts and history:

• 2010: 1.6 Billion / 2030: 2.2 Billion Muslims (25% of World Pop.)
• 3% Muslims live in most developed regions.
• 35 of 195 World Countries currently under Sharia law.
• There are 1.6 billion Muslims in the world today. Of course not all of them are radicals! The majority of them are peaceful people. The radicals are estimated to be between 15 to 25 percent, according to all intelligence services around the world. That leaves 75 percent of them peaceful people.
• But when you look at 15 to 25 percent of the world’s Muslim population, you’re looking at 240 million to 400 million people dedicated to the destruction of Western civilization. That is bigger than the United States of 320 milion people. 

Do you know your U.S. history? - Learn from your past, it's your future... 

After the U.S. declared its independence in 1775 from England and entered into the Revolutionary War, France protected U.S. ships until the end in 1784; afterwards it was under our U.S. Navy. Then in July 1785, the U.S. suffered under the ruthless Islamist Barbary Coast pirates that captured two U.S. ships for the unheard ransom of nearly $60,000. The pirates demanded bribes to appease their extortion under Sharia Law for collection of dhimmitude, payments made by unbelievers or 'infidels' to live or work under Islam, rather than engaging them head-on in war.  

Thomas Jefferson was the U.S. Minister to France from 1784 to 1789. At the beginning Jefferson was against any further payments to the pirates even proposing a plan for a 'coalition of allied nations' who together could force the Islamic states into perpetual peace. The coalition failed. It sounded like a 'coalition of the willing' where the early documented use of that phrase was by President Bill Clinton in June 1994 in retaliation to possible operations against North Korea with other countries at the height of the 1994 stand-off with that country over nuclear weapons. The coalition failed. The idea that any coalition partners have helped out when historically the U.S. has gone into war, the U.S. always has been spending all its treasure and blood with little help from any of these coalition partners.

The 1785 U.S. Congress was disinterested in his plan, so Jefferson finally acquiesced to Congress who paid the ransom demands over the next fifteen years to Tripoli, Morocco and Algiers upwards of $1 Million a year.

It was not until 1801, after sworn in that as President Thomas Jefferson he let the Muslim Pasha know what he could do with his demand of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year thereafter. The United States then declared war on Islam and the Barbary Coast pirates as President Thomas Jefferson dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean to teach the Muslim nations a lesson they would never forget. Algiers and Tunis both knew of the past history of American cowardice and acquiescence but saw a new U.S. will and might to strike back and immediately abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli. The U.S. Marine Corps led the battle line 'to the shores of Tripoli' as in the Marine hymn and they would forever after be known as the 'leathernecks' for their leather collars of their uniforms. The Queran states, "Meet the unbeliever and smite at the necks" or in other words, hack off their heads with swords. Their leather collars prevented the Marine heads from being chopped off by Muslim scimitars when boarding their ships. The war raged on for four more years until 1805 with Tripoli's defeat.

The Algerian aggressions again flared up in 1815 under President James Madison who sent in the U.S. Naval expedition. A treaty was secured from the Algerians effectively ending capturing any more U.S. ships under their ruling Muslim laws. The U.S. Senate finally ratified the treaty on December 5, 1815.

President Thomas Jefferson, as the former U.S. Minister to France and long before leaving France in 1879, recognized a fear that someday this brand of Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States. Jefferson was anti-Islamist, not anti-Islam. The distinction is that he cared less if his neighbors claimed there were twenty gods or no gods, as long as he neither picked his pocket or broke his leg. Fundamentalist Islam does both with the underlying problem that it is both political and religious and the two cannot be separated. The Islamist believes that man-made laws are inferior and must be replaced with Sharia law and that governments worldwide should be Islamic. Fundamentalist Islam is anathema to everything Jefferson stood for as it vehemently disagrees with our U.S. Constitutional laws.

Did you learn something interesting that our schools don't teach about in our U.S. history or government?

Four Questions Obama Not Answered Yet - Can You?

For all of the "anti-Fox News" folks, none of this information came from Fox. All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the Kapiolani hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted herein). It is very easy for someone to check out. 

4 Simple Questions 

• Back in 1961 "people of color" were called "Negroes." 

1. So, how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state his father's race as "African" American when the term wasn't even used at that time?   

• The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961 and lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, Right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya, Africa.” This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. 

2. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate".  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_%28http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya%29 

• On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "Kauikeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. 

3. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

http://http/http/www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
(http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx) 

• In Obama's book “Dreams from my Father” it states how proud he was of his father fighting in WW II. Barack Obama's "birth certificate" states his father was 25 years old in 1961 which means his date of birth was 1936. Any history book verifies that WW II was between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in Wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old. 

4. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is personally unprincipled, or simply chooses to alter the facts to bolster his weak resume or for unscrupulous political purposes?

Why haven't any of these questions been really answered in the major media and forgotten?

Was Castro Jewish? ...How?

Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews 

http://www.jewfaq.org/ashkseph.htm

How influential have Jewish leaders been in our history? This brief synopsis may offer two people that, surprisingly, you may not have known about; one from the past and one in the present. They certainly offer a stark contrast to diametrically opposed political beliefs.

In 1755, Alexander Hamilton was born to Rachael Fawcette Levine, named Alexander Levine, of Jewish Ashkenazi lineage, in St. Croix, the West Indies. After changing his name from Levi to Hamilton and his geographical situs to the United States, on December 14, 1780 he married Elizabeth Schuyler and into the Rothschild family—the banking scions then and now. The United States upon entering the Revolutionary War against England was indebted to the Rothschild Bank for loans to finance expenses and soldiers. The seeds of finance were planted by The Bank Of Rothchild to finally bloom in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank run by private bankers as the central banking institution of the United States Treasury. Now that is really influential power inside our government--it's an ongoing debate to end it too.  

Fidel & Raul CastroFidel Castro is Jewish as his grandfather was a Sephardic Jew in Turkey. As much what news is heard from that closed island nation, the words 'Communist' and 'Atheist' are the descriptions normally bantered around within the official government political manifestos. The Holy Catholic Church was banned and shunned by the state.

As the aging dictator, 88 yrs. old, relinquished his power to his brother Raul Castro due to debilitating health issues in recent years the tiny island is abuzz as the reign of Castro winds down with his ultimate demise; time has finally taken him down. Surprisingly, the reality of a post-Castro Cuba that attempts to remain communist will find itself in a cul-de-sac where old policies and political system are at a dead end. Cuba must try new ways but the citizens need help; hopefully the Cuba ex-pats in America can assist with help. Otherwise, the Army takes the reigns as the next regime.  

Subgroups of Jews with different culture and traditions:

• Ashkenazic: Descendants of Jews from France, Germany and Eastern Europe.

• Sephardic: Descendants of Jews from Spain, Portugal, North Africa & the Middle East.

• Mizrachi: Descendants of Jews from North Africa and the Middle East.

• Other subgroups are: Yemenite, Ethiopian and Oriental.

Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews represent two distinct subcultures of Judaism. All Jews share the same basic beliefs, but there are some variations in culture and practice. It's not clear when the split began, but it has existed for more than a thousand years, because around the year 1000 C.E., Rabbi Gershom ben Judah issued an edict against polygamy that was accepted by Ashkenazim but not by Sephardim.

Historically, Sephardic Jews have been more integrated into the local non-Jewish culture than Ashkenazic Jews. In the Christian lands where Ashkenazic Judaism flourished, the tension between Christians and Jews was great and Jews tended to be isolated from their non-Jewish neighbors. In Muslem lands where Sephardic Judaism developed, there was less segregation and oppression and their thought and culture was strongly influenced by Arabic and Greek philosophy and science. Why are these subculture differences important? They illustrate a classic case of whether there can ever be a 'cumbaya moment' to get together peacefully with Muslims since the centuries old history of mistrust from Jews about Muslims who have fought Jews over the centuries. It is not a whimsical decision of Israel, today it is a choice to defend and protect Judaism and their way of life against Islam and Sharia Law.

In Israel, a little more than half of all Jews are Mizrachim, descended from Jews who have been in the land since ancient times or who were forced out of Arab countries after Israel was founded. Most of the rest are Ashkenazic, descended from Jews who came to the Holy Land (then controlled by the Ottoman Turks) instead of the United States in the late 1800s, or from Holocaust survivors, or from other immigrants who came at various times. 

In America, many of the early Jewish settlers of North America who were Sephardic immigrated from Spain and Portugal. Their first Jewish congregation in North America, Shearith Israel, founded in what is now New York in 1684. Subsequently, most Jews today are Ashkenazim, descended from Jews who emigrated from Germany and Eastern Europe from the mid 1800s to the early 1900s. 

Sephardic Jews are often subdivided into Sephardim, from Spain and Portugal, and Mizrachim, from the Northern Africa and the Middle East. The word "Mizrachi" comes from the Hebrew word for Eastern. There is much overlap between the Sephardim and Mizrachim. 

Hitler & Muslim Grand Mufti Share Anti-Jew Views

Where is the outrage when public executions are considered more important than guilt or innocence? Is it then the sole intention to merely show the gruesome fate that all dissenters will suffer under penalty of death?

Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini & Adolph Hitler - 1941These public demonstrations go back under the British Mandate when the mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini was the key nationalist figure among Muslims in Palestine. Fearful that increased Jewish immigration to Palestine would damage Arab standing in the area, the mufti engineered the bloody riots against Jewish settlement in 1929 and 1936. The mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini killed Palestinians who were amenable to a Jewish presence in the region. The mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini was also a Nazi sympathizer and unabashed antisemite who visited Munich, Germany and Herr Adolph Hitler. His personal travel itinerary included side trips to the SS Gen. Himmler at POW Camp.Jewish Holocaust concentration camps and SS General Heinrich Himmler with SS troop inspections in Bosnia.  

In the 1980's under Yasser Arafat's leadership, the 'Fatah' evolved from a resistance groupMufti & SS Gen. Heinrich Himmler  into the dominant faction of the militant 'PLO', Palestine Liberation Organization. The movement has fallen from its position of dominance since the death of Yasser Arafat in 2004, and in 2006 lost parliamentary elections to the militant 'Hamas' group. In June, 2007, it was effectively driven out of the Gaza Strip after violent clashes with Hamas. No doubt that these Hamas militants are violent, evil terrorists.

Where are all of the Palestinian moderates that can negotiate peace with Israelis?

Hamas Ensignia

The real ugly truth is that Hamas suspiciously considers their fellow Palestinians as Jewish collaborators when they advocate talks with the Jews. On August 22, 2014, recent barbarous atrocities bear this out with eighteen Palestinians executed with a shot to the head and then sprayed with automatic gunfire. These public displays of Hamas executions followed an Israeli retaliatory attack that killed three senior commanders of Hamas' military wing for them shooting rockets into Israel that killed more civilians after Hamas violated another ceasefire. 

During the memorable 1980 anti-Israel 'infitada' or uprising, in Gaza Yasser Arafat's Fatah faction murdered eight hundred Palestinians for collaboration with the Jews.

How can the Palestinians ever have peace if they keep on executing the ones that want peace? ...And the Jewish State is blamed for this middle East terrorism? 

Every U.S. Voter is a Winner!

How egalitarian is the 'right to vote' as it is relating to, or believing in the principle that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities? Under our U.S. Constitutional law, it guarantees the people their voice in how the government operates. Every U.S. voter lives in a free society that recognizes their legal rights under law as well as their natural, universal inalienable rights that are inseparable from the individual. It's like winning the Super Lotto!

To boost voter turnout, a large municipal authority, the Los Angeles Ethics Commission has proposed an idea to lure more voters to the polls. With a miniscule 23% of registered voter turnout for the 2012 Mayoral election, down from 37% in 2001, and a dismal 15% turnout for 2013 district elections, L.A. City Council President Herb Wesson said, "Voter turnout was abysmal, and it's embarrassing." So, in a bid to raise voter turnout, the commission has voted to send to the City Council a proposal for a ballot measure to be sent to voters that changes the city charter to allow 'cash prize lotteries' to entice voter turnout in only municipal elections without any Federal offices or measures.

It's a sad commentary when voters have to be enticed to get out to vote with a promise of winning a lotto! Worse, who are they going to vote for when they get to the polls? The guy that brought them to the party, the 'voter van' or the 'voter taxi' rides sponsored by a political candidate or party? Don't dispair though, maybe you have to know a little more about Pre-American history...

Here is a tale from 1758, before the United States of America was born in 1776, the 'colonial times', and it seems voters haven't really change a bit in 256 years!

George Washington, the father of country won his first election in 1758. Washington biographer Dennis Pogue, vice president of preservation at Washington's home of Mount Vernon said about elections, "Voting day was a reason to binge in Colonial times, and the candidate who served up the most hooch often won."

Dennis Pogue reveals that the father of the nation lost his first campaign in 1755 to the House of Burgesses largely because he didn't put on an alcohol-laden circus at the polls. That year, Washington got 40 votes. The winner, who plied voters with beer, whiskey, rum punch, and wine, got 271 votes. 

A quick learner, Washington won three years later with the help of alcohol. "What do you know, he was successful and got 331 votes," says Pogue, author of the new book "Founding Spirits: George Washington and the Beginnings of the American Whiskey Industry." Washington's 1758 election to the House of Burgesses cost him 39 pounds, 6 shillings, a sum, which bought him 'a hogshead and a barrel of punch, thirty-five gallons of wine, forty-three gallons of strong beer, cider, and dinner for his friends.