Clinton, Bush, Obama Public Schools Suck!

For the past twenty years, 1974 to 2014, every President faults the system forWisconsin Teachers Unions bully Governor, Schools & Parents & loses fight. children not learning their ABC's or 123's in public education. So, the answer has always been to throw more Federal money and run up higher state taxes to pay into the school system to hire more educators by offering more pay, benefits and pensions to attract the best teachers. The top-heavy teachers' unions, in the meantime, have become strong and powerful by micro-managing all of our teacher staffing, school curriculum, text books, children's health and welfare programs too. It has become a taxing 'nanny-state,' institutional behemoth and that's being very modest. So why are our children still failing?

It's as if one hands over their five yr. old to the school board officials and say, "I give you the child, give me back the young adult," then, they release them back as an eighteen yr. old with a high school education, social values and self esteem.  Hmn... I don't think it ever really works out that way, even if many parents do abdicate all their parental roles every day. So, where does the education start?

How about with the parents first? They must take responsibility to go to their parent-teacher meetings or parents' assemblies to find out how their children are being taught in their local school. Then, as their children attend the classes at school, the parent must monitor what their children are doing and coordinate with the teachers about subjects covered. Now after many parents stop laughing, they never will do anything like I just described. So why don't parents bother to get excited about the lousy grades and dropout rates, especially within the minority communities?

Maybe it's because the parents don't really care? That's certainly a good answer, in fact it is the most truthful one since it is a hard fact of life that most are often single parent, women head of the household too. Our school education problems go even further back than President Bill Clinton in 1994. In fact, it is just progressively getting worse faster. But why?

It's obvious in this twenty-first century that technology is moving so quickly that the illiterates, untrained and unskilled will be pushed aside. Many foresee a future with withOrwell's novel on the coming Government mind control of people. an ignorant electorate that will allow liberal, progressive, government-centric planning. It will dictate where these kinds of people will be relegated by their production values they can do to work in various areas of the country and told where to populate to live whether they like it or not--it is closest to a 'public housing projects' concept. Looks as if its 'Orwellian'--Like in George Orwell's 1984 'Big Brother is watching you' novel?--or UN Agenda 21?

Please use the Rovalocity search engine box on our website and enter 'UN Agenda 21'. Read other blogs about a United Nations Plan that President Clinton signed and has been ramping up with unbelievable provisions since its inception to redistribute U.S. property, freedoms and people too. You make up your own mind.

The problems in schools are not just limited to the funding, curriculum, facilities or students. Students will never reach college potential if they are taught in bilingual classrooms. Education should be taught in English, the global 'lingua franca,' starting from elementary level through high school--currently all college level classes, text books and lectures are English only too.

Tip: Give all the kids who pass their tests 'School Vouchers' to get out of the dead-end public schools and get into 'Charter Schools' or 'Private Schools'. Judge Judy Sheindlin, a long time New Yorker and famous TV Judge, is very familiar with the entire New York City schools system. Recently, Judge Judy commented, "I think of all of the kids like a fresh box of raspberries I take home to eat," and "And if I find a bad one in the box, I throw it away because if I leave it in the box it spoils the entire box and all of the raspberries will go bad." Judge Judy says that analogy depicts exactly what is happening now.  

In the New York public schools the bad kids continue to act up and disrupt classes, so the good students do not receive any education or diploma worth the paper it's printed on. The School Unions do not want to lose control of the teachers or suffer membership dues losses. The Federal Government funding feeds those Union coffers to curry votes too-- it's almost an impossible cycle to break without voter intervention at the polls to elect politicians who want to help students and parents. 

Believe it or not, the teachers themselves are letting the students down too. In turn, the teachers' unions are protecting those poor performance educators with tenure too. Please read a letter sent home to a mother below. What is really remarkable is that teacher sent that letter out to a parent. Even more stunning is the question: Did that teacher instruct students for another twenty years from 1994 to 2014?  Now, is that scary!  

Obama Cap & Trade on BOGUS Climate Claims

 

Greenpeace Founder Debunks Global Climate Change

President Obama has now declared that the global warming is “fact” in his January 28, 2014 State of the Union. His administration has attempted to argue that the recent U.S. cold snap was duly influenced by a warmer planet. If Obama believes Rahm Emmanuel's quote from Sir Winston Churchill, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste," is this another timed attempt to get a 'Cap and Trade' tax bill through congress again? Hmn... Where's Al Gore?

Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore’s testimony to a U.S. Senate committee come after Obama's comments. Moore argued that the current argument that the burning of fossil fuels is driving global warming over the past century lacks scientific evidence. He added that the Earth is in an unusually cold period and some warming would be a good thing.

“There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years,” according to Moore’s testimony. “Today, we live in an unusually cold period in the history of life on earth and there is no reason to believe that a warmer climate would be anything but beneficial for humans and the majority of other species.”

Junk Science Peddler for Cap & Trade Tax.

“It is important to recognize, in the face of dire predictions about a [two degrees Celsius] rise in global average temperature, that humans are a tropical species,” Moore said. “We evolved at the equator in a climate where freezing weather did not exist. The only reasons we can survive these cold climates are fire, clothing, and housing.”

“It could be said that frost and ice are the enemies of life, except for those relatively few species that have evolved to adapt to freezing temperatures during this Pleistocene Ice Age,” he added. “It is ‘extremely likely’ that a warmer temperature than today’s would be far better than a cooler one.”

“The fact that we had both higher temperatures and an ice age at a time when CO2 emissions were 10 times higher than they are today fundamentally contradicts the certainty that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming,” Moore said.

I really cannot add anything more to his scientific analysis. But I do know as taxpayers and citizens in the United States, we cannot be duped into the "carbon footprint,' our own personal consumption quantity, in order to levy Federal tax on our energy consumption for cars, houses and products we own. Its with no valid scientific basis they can make these claims! 

Hillary's General David Betray-Us

I have thought about the core value of integrity with Hillary Clinton running for the office of President, and very well aware of the political theater and jockeying for favor that characterizes her climb, that from any vantage point of many in the race views Hillary's 'integrity' as, ...just another word in the dictionary located somewhere between 'incest' and 'intercourse.' --one doesn't know whether to feel molested or violated by her sleazy style politics. 

In the new 'hot off the presses' revisionist biographical tome called 'HRC,' Hillary Rodham Clinton, an extremely volitile 'Petraeus' quote has now appeared for public voter consumption: 

"General David Petraeus praised Hillary Clinton as a potential president, specifically citing what many consider her biggest obstacle as a candidate: her role as Secretary of State overseeing the American compound in Benghazi when it was attacked in 2012."

“She’d make a tremendous president,” Petraeus said. “Like a lot of great leaders, her most impressive qualities were most visible during tough times. In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, for example, she was extraordinarily resolute, determined, and controlled.” [Following the attack, she was extraordinarily controlled by controlling the narrative that the attack was actually a spontaneous protest, sparked by a YouTube video]

This surprising revelation of Hillary for President in 2016 is absolutely hysterical. General David Petraeus was excoriated by radical, rabid left-wing liberals as 'General Betray-us' lying about the War in Iraq, who is now the one they all hang onto with every utterance as sweet honey dripping from his golden tongue in Hillary's new book-- as if his oratorical mea culpa revelation is supposed to exonerate Hillary Clinton for the Benghazi attack debacle?

The $64 thousand dollar question is if the politician who, as a senator, [Hillary] accused General Petraeus of lying in his testimony before the Senate, who later admitted in front of then-Secretary of Defense Bob Gates that she had opposed the US military surge in Iraq for purely political purposes; then, Why is Petraeus endorsing Hillary Clinton? ..."Please answer that question!" ..."Bueller? ...Bueller? ...Bueller? ...Anyone?"  [From comedy movie, "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", spoken by Ben Stein, then actor & now Conservative Pundit]

Climate Changes are not a Climate Change

Climates change, but do not change Climate. Politicians blame what is happening through anthropogenic (man-caused) global warming. Joe Bastardi, a highly regarded Meteorologist with the National Weather Service, states, "Blaming Turbulent Weather On Global Warming Is Extreme Nonsense." and, "Part of that appears to be attributable to very short memories concerning times past, and even shorter media attention spans. It seems that 'worse' is always more newsworthy than 'better'. The fact is that those alarmist claims simply aren’t true." So why don't politicians understand that scientific fact? After all, people only want pollution controlled, not pollution controlling people with 'Cap and Trade" laws that dictates how people should live.

Solar Flares bombard the Earth's atmosphere daily.

'Cap and Trade" laws regulate by the setting customer rates on how high the 'allowable Cap' is for each personal energy usage while subject to taxes for any excess overage. Of course, you can "Trade' your 'saved or unused' energy units for credits or sell them on a Federal energy exchange. All these "Cap and Trade" tax schemes are just political scams to fleece the people for energy consumption programs that save no energy or reduce any pollution with questionable net environmental impact.

The U.N. Agenda 21 contains an action plan under New World Order government environmental population controls that implement worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. 

Smoggy Jet-streams are blowing all over onto our North American continent from the 'Big Five' polluters: China, India, Russia, So East Asia and Australia. With the world economies getting really dicey, they won't slow down their own flagging economies to correct worldwide pollution problems. A lot of lip service and the U.S. keeps giving up more market share with trade positions as these polluters jump ahead leaving the U.S. singularly to eat up all of their carbon footprints emissions to reduce overall worldwide carbon credit totals - not fair, not sustainable. 

To hear complaints from the Sierra Club, Green Peace, et. al., they always paint the United States as the worst country on the planet although air pollution has definitely improved here during the past fifty years.  Personally, I vividly remember living in the 1950's when the air pollution in the Los Angeles basin was a red, smoky thick haze that hung over the city. It burned my eyes, irritated my lungs and made it simply uncomfortable to play outside without my chest aching. Those were the good ole days; yeah right, sorta like Beijing and Mumbai, for instance, are today!  Ugh! 

So, the 'Big Five' could start to do something themselves. After all, their jet-streams blow through our North America atmosphere from their dirty smoke stacks and autos. The U.S. has not gotten much cooperation from them, however, and they will remain closed-minded unless their own citizens really start demanding overdue preventative smog programs themselves--it's a matter of life and breath!

 

A Lie is A Lie - "So help me Hannah"!

As Muslim-Christian relations are under the spotlight around the world, US judges sometimes face a vexing question: Can witnesses raise their right hand and swear to tell the truth ... on the Koran? So what happens to the practice of prompting the witness to recite an oath to tell the truth "so help me God."  Many courts have dropped the once common practice of having a witness place his left hand upon a Bible while raising his right hand and swearing an oath to tell the truth. 

In most cases, U.S. courts have long since allowed witnesses who object to swearing an oath to God to simply affirm that they promise to tell the truth. Already, witnesses in American courts do not have to take a religious oath and can instead simply testify on pain of perjury. It's up to judges to decide what passes for an oath. 

Most have apparently given other oaths wide latitude. In a federal terrorism case in 1997 in Washington D.C., for instance, the judge allowed Muslim witnesses to swear to Allah. And the practice isn't new: Mochitura Hashimoto, the Japanese submarine commander who testified in the court martial of a US Navy captain in 1945, was allowed by a military tribunal to swear on his beliefs of Shinto, the ancient religion of Japan.

As to the question of whether courts still ask trial witnesses to swear they will tell the truth with an oath ending in the words "So help me God," there is no definitive answer — the U.S. legal system encompasses courts of various levels (from municipal city and county courts to state and federal courts), all of which may have differing procedural practices for the swearing-in of witnesses.

My advice?--Don't get your shorts into a knot!

"So help me God," some people are just going to perjure themselves no matter of the oath, it is up to the legal system to sort out the truth in the end. After all, if it goes to jury, the facts are decided by twelve different people before a final judgement is made--and that is sometimes imperfect too--"No Lie!"