Ready to Lose Your Internet? ...Really? ...Yeah!

For God's Sake! - For Your Own Sake! - Tell Congress to keep the Ban on this Obama Bill!

 HAPPENS BEFORE OBAMA LEAVES OFFICE - THE OCTOBER SURPRISE!

The Obama administration has again announced the end to the U.S. stewardship open Internet; Russia and China will take advantage of the American ICANN surrender too.  Authoritarian regimes want to grab control recognizing the 'different modes and methods in Internet management'.--code for a major subversion of the Internet and restriction to freedom of speech. 

Meanwhile, Obama is stealthly trying to pass his 'Executive Order' on the down-low and bypass congressional oversight once again; it will be far from the 'modest change in policy' that Obama claimed in March, 2014.  Is Obama aware of the major damages?  Of course not, he is again clueless!--How many more times must the public take that silly clueless excuse and just admit he knows what he is doing?        

Sands in an Hourglass."Like sands in the hourglass, so are 'The Days of Our Lives'."--to borrow the line from a popular daytime soap opera introduction. Since 1965, it is one of the longest-running scripted television programs in the world. It is even older than the Internet--my how time flies!

FACTOID: On October 24, 1995 the Federal Networking Council, FNC, unanimously passed a resolution defining the term 'Internet'. This definition was developed in consultation with members of the internet and intellectual property rights communities.

RESOLUTION: The Federal Networking Council (FNC) agrees that the following language reflects our definition of the term 'Internet'. It refers to the global information system that -- (i) is logically linked together by a globally unique address space based on the Internet Protocol (IP) or its subsequent extensions/follow-ons; (ii) is able to support communications using the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite or its subsequent extensions/follow-ons, and/or other IP-compatible protocols; and (iii) provides, uses or makes accessible, either publicly or privately, high level services layered on the communications and related infrastructure described herein.

"The Internet has changed much in the three decades since it came into existence. It was conceived in the era of time-sharing, but has survived into the era of personal computers, client-server and peer-to-peer computing, and the network computer. It was designed before LANs existed, but has accommodated that new network technology, as well as the more recent ATM and frame switched services. It was envisioned as supporting a range of functions from file sharing and remote login to resource sharing and collaboration which had spawned electronic mail and more recently the World Wide Web, Internet telephone and Internet television.

"The most pressing question for the future of the Internet is not how the technology will change, but how the process of change and evolution itself will be managed. The architecture of the Internet has always been driven by a core group of designers, but the form of that group has changed as the number of interested parties has grown. With the success of the Internet has come a proliferation of stakeholders - stakeholders now with an economic as well as an intellectual investment in the network. [Those major multi-national stakeholders have taken their suppressive political underpinnings to threaten the global Internet freedom of speech that have been advanced since the beginning by the United States ICANN organization.] 

"We now see, in the debates over control of the domain name space and the form of the next generation IP addresses, a struggle to find the next social structure that will guide the Internet in the future. The form of that structure will be harder to find, given the large number of concerned stakeholders. At the same time, the industry struggles to find the economic rationale for the large investment needed for the future growth, for example to upgrade residential access to a more suitable technology. If the Internet stumbles, it will not be because we lack for technology, vision, or motivation. It will be because we cannot set a direction and march collectively into the future."

Like those 'sands in the hourglass' our Internet freedoms are quickly slipping right between our fingers to be lost forever. With our U.S. Federal Communications Commission, the United Nations, the European Union, the various sovereign nations, partisan coalitions and special interest groups they all have strict regulatory agendas to curb current Internet freedoms. Can they all get along?--Read about the U.N. Security Council...

Look at the ridiculous farse exhibited by the United Nations Security Council, its members are so stacked up against any United States participation. Under the Charter, the Security Council has primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. It has 15 Members, and each Member has one vote. Under the Charter, all Member States are obligated to comply with Council decisions. The Permanent Five members, P5, are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.  Each of the permanent members has power to veto, enabling them to prevent the adoption of any "substantive" draft Council resolution, regardless of the level of international support for the draft. 

All substantive United States' resolutions are null and void by design. --And so after reviewing over 70 years of poor performance of the U.N., do we now give up U.S. control of our Internet and all set a direction to march collectively into the global future?? 

WATCH YOUR INTERNET BILL GO UP!

OR

EMAIL SENATORS & CONGRESSMEN NOW!

A Real Spin in an Airplane - A Tall Tale of a Story

THE GULFSTREAM G550

LEGENDARY QUALITY, FLEXIBLE PERFORMANCE

The G550 has the efficiency to fly 6,750 nautical miles/12,501 kilometers nonstop, but also is capable of operating out of short-field, high-altitude airports. Payload is a plus, too. The G550 can transport up to 18 passengers and still has the range to fly nonstop more than 12 hours.

The Whole Story

Famous Quotes:  …You already know the end of the stories!

• ·         Obama said, "You can keep your plan & your Dr." ... 
• ·         Bill said, "I did not have sex with that woman"…
• ·         Hillary said, "It's a video that started the attack that killed the Ambassador" …
• ·         Loretta said, “We talked for half an hour about grandkids and golf”…

A Field-base operator (FBO) is a commercial business granted the right by an airport to operate on the airport and provide aeronautical services such as fueling and parking. Unidentified personnel who worked at the FBO in Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport called a TV anchor at the local ABC Station who verified the meeting. A second independent source at the airport said Loretta and Bill were alone together on board AG Loretta Lynch’s jet for half an hour.

Question: Why would AG Loretta Lynch go to Phoenix first which is 600 miles South of Aspen and then go North to Aspen from Phoenix? Anyone check on the actual flight plans of both planes?

Well, let’s see... AG Loretta Lynch was headed to Aspen, Co from Washington DC for a speaking engagement, a distance of around 1500 miles in almost a direct line from East to West. The Government plane she was flying in was more than likely a G550 with a range of 6750 miles.

She did not need to stop in Phoenix for fuel because if she would have flown direct, fuel would not be necessary. In fact, if you do the math, the G550 has the range to make that direct round trip route without refueling.

Question: Why was Bill Clinton’s plane waiting for AG Loretta Lynch’s plane to land in Phoenix when she was going to Aspen?

Also remember now, AG Loretta Lynch does not have any grandkids and doesn’t play golf. ...Hmmn!

The meeting was either planned to put the Clinton Fix on or to decide on which golf course Bill played on in Phoenix.

 

Immigration vs. Colonization

This is Colonization Pure & Simple!

Folks, let's get serious: Not all people coming into the United States have any intentions of ever becoming citizens or paying taxes - we must be selective.   

 "Among developed nations, only the US and Canada still offer automatic citizenship to children born on their soil. Not a single European country follows the practice." - Liz Peek in the Fiscal Times.  

They only wish to reap the generous benefits given from tax payers' pockets with no intentions or aspirations to be American citizens. They only want to establish colonies: ethnic living areas, ghettos, communes and separate communities devoid of the American experience with the national spirit or even the laws; i.e, Sharia Laws. No solid border protection erodes national sovereignty and immigration controls that leads to economic disaster - just ask the Europeans! 

"The exorbitant cost of educating the children of illegal immigrants in public schools across the U.S. is sure to skyrocket now that a new study confirms the number of anchor babies has nearly doubled in the last few years and will likely keep growing.

Unauthorized immigrants comprise slightly more than 4% of the adult population of the U.S., but because they are relatively young and have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8%) and the child population (7% of those younger than age 18) in this country. [These figures are based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s March 2009 Current Population Survey.]

"U.S. taxpayers already dish out around $52 billion to educate the children of illegal aliens with local governments taking the biggest hit (nearly $50 billion) and the feds contributing about $2 billion. The biggest chunk goes to elementary and high school education, but a substantial portion ($8.3 billion) also goes to specialized instruction for limited English speakers and several hundred million dollars is spent on subsidized college tuitions.

"Those already astronomical figures will surely increase as the population of illegal immigrant offspring swells. A new study released by a nonprofit dedicated to chronicling “Latino’s diverse experiences in a changing America” reveals a surge in anchor babies that will inevitably take a huge toll on U.S. taxpayers. It also indicates that automatic citizenship granted to all U.S.-born children—as per the Constitution’s 14th Amendment—is a huge lure for illegal immigrants.

"That’s probably why illegal immigrants are having babies in the U.S. at a much higher rate than the general population, according to the Pew Hispanic Center study released this week. The number of children born to illegal immigrants in the U.S. jumped to 4 million from 2.7 million in a six-year period and the children of illegal aliens accounted for 340,000 out of the 4.3 million babies born in 2008, the latest year for which figures were available. [The latest year for report now available 2014.]

"This means that nearly one out of every 13 children born in the U.S. have an illegal immigrant parent. On a broader scale, nearly 79% of the 5.1 million children of illegal aliens were born in this country and are therefore U.S. citizens, the analysis found."

"This means that Americans will pay more to educate anchor babies as well as provide them with other welfare benefits normally denied if they were foreign born." 

Jade Helm 15 is not a Movie - It's Real!

Although not a movie, the title of "Jade Helm 15" does sound like another episode in the James Bond or another Sci-Fi hero saga. Actually, the mystery deepens as the Jade Helm 15 has created conspiracy theories that are based on the eponymous (of a person) giving their name to something like this United States military training exercise, scheduled to take place in multiple US states from July 15 to September 15, 2015. This has not been described as a "DOD Joint Exercise" which therefore defines these maneuvers are for the sole purpose to practice homeland engagement on U.S. soil for a specialized group of soldiers in a domestic role. 

The announcements of these training exercises have raised concerns that have been characterized by The New York Times as "travers[ing] the outer edges of political paranoia." They should too since the shroud of secrecy about the maneuvers does raise questions about the seemingly odd name and just what's going on in the great State of Texas too.

I have researched the "JADE" name which refers to the "Joint Assistant for Deployment & Execution" software program. It is military software which is "network centric warfare" for developing and leveraging information superiority in AI, Artificial Intelligence" programs that use force deployment systems calculating best strategies in fighting insurgents.

The name "Helm" refers to taking over leading and directing activities under military controls. This military JADE software program exercise has been described in seminars as to engage in "asymmetric warfare against belligerence." The word asymmetric refers to unequally matched combatants in the field such as terrorists, rioters, insurgents, unruly civilians that are defined as the "belligerents."--their small arms and munitions for retaliation do not match the military complex and therefore are asymmetrically smaller or more easily defeated.

The training program also encompasses securing tactical information. It is through undercover intelligence through spy networks, data network monitoring, populace surveillance and extensive data mining of a population's activities.  

The public hearing these concerns have asked and received assistance from Senator Ted Cruz and Congressman Louis Gohmert to inquire and watch over this program. They both assured the public they will see it does not in any way encroach on the state rights of Texans--only time will bear out citizen's concerns.

The Hijra Highway - Dead-End Road for U.S.

"Hijri" is the Muslim colonization of countries as commanded by Mohammed to dominate the nations of world to establish Sharia laws--Muslims literally have been scampering down through porous borders onto U.S. highways while settling across the nation. Our own uber-liberal U.S. government under Federal agencies are enabling this to happen on such a grand scale of immigration numbers without anyone mentioning it on either side of aisle these days, why? ...maybe voters just too stupid to know??

Ann Corcoran has put together a very through book that she heavily researched. This short 4 minute video touches on main points to share with you, the reader, to understand this alarming trend.  

Time: 04.00

Witness some of these major changes now: Sharia Law has a sturdy foothold in Minnesota, Wisconsin, New York and New Jersey. In New York and New Jersey old Muslim men are being allowed to marry 10-14 year old girls and parade the marriage couples down the streets in these two states; the police/government officials do nothing. In both Minnesota & Wisconsin there are entire counties where there are postings for "outsiders to stay out" as Sharia Law is in effect. U.S. Law enforcement and government officials stay clear of these areas for fear of reprisals! America is losing it's grip on Freedom! 

Bio: Ann Corcoran is an independent blogger, a truly unpaid patriotic individual, who started out to get the word out about the atrocious refugee situation in the United States. Ann's widely-read blog website, https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com, has become another true bell-weather warning on how the political climate in our country has tilted dangerously way off radical left-wing in a death knell for our very secular democracy. She has appeared on national television shows, a frequent guest speaker and heard in radio interviews. Ann Corcoran says, "We also educate with articles from around the world on refugees, so readers know what is happening elsewhere."

In the defense of her own information blog Ann Corcoran further adds, "So one final thing, we don’t care what you call us!" -- "[Also] some of you reading this have for way too long intimidated and silenced people you disagree with by calling them racists, xenophobes, hatemongers and on and on and on. It doesn’t work here, in fact, when you start with that sort of attack and don’t address the issues we raise, it validates our work." [Ann does not waste time or energy with useless debating.]