Navigation
SEARCH BOX - USE KEY WORDS, NAMES, OR PHRASES.

866-391-6593

Call For Quote

or Click Link!

  •   Build Your Brand
  •       with KLAS!
CODAmeds®

CODAmeds® Dispensers

Manage pills & supplements

  

 

Entries from December 1, 2014 - December 31, 2014

Tuesday
Dec302014

See the Hottest New Invention Out: Wrist Computer

No doubt you have seen the new wrist watches that have computers in them.Dick Tracy got his 2-Way radio watch in Jan, 1946. After I personally wore one brand, the Motorola watch, Moto 360, with blue tooth communication at a Best Buy store recently, the glamour and thrill immediately dropped away. They were too big and bulky to wear on my wrist and I am a man, so a woman will find it even more cumbersome to wear it herself in spite of their glitzy ads showing sexy women wearing these bulky wrist manacles on slender arms as fashion statements.

There were others there that looked like those slim techno sports wristbands that read heart, caloric burn rates, etc. They had small digital displays, but all appeared to be "first to the marketplace" products but whether they are the be-all end-all yet for this new computer form will be hard to say at this moment.

With the Cicret Bracelet, you can make your skin your new touch screen. Read your mails, play your favorite games, answer your calls, check the weather, find your way…Do whatever you want on your arm. 

 

Please view this video and see an amazing new device, the Cicret bracelet. 

Time: 02:44

 

 

Here's the background story: 

With the twenty-first century now leaping forward so quickly, the world isThe "Real Deal" medicine sold to cure all what ails you. hurtling into the information age with the help of computer aided devices; we as a population are caught up in this whirlwind of new discoveries. Our world of imagination seems limitless as new discoveries and technological developments keep magically appearing daily. When will it stop? Hopefully never because that's what excites people to give them a reason to live. With that ominous promise comes responsibility, not so much to finding new discoveries but as it should also be a promise to each other to be vigilant too. With all of these ideas come the quacks, hucksters, charlatans and purveyors of absolute flim-flam and false claims--buyers beware in these times of new discoveries, someone is out there to just plain screw you.

This is probably by far one of the greatest scams of all time, even beating out ridiculous ones from Liberia. Those ones are real classics, but on an obvious real big doofus scale of over the top dumb people's bait and switch swindles. The sophistication of this scam is right near to the top of a "Bernie Madoff" mega-scale of lying and deceit mixed up with a lot of scientific mumble jumbo that sounds so convincing too.

Go to see more info at www.cicret.com. At their official site you notice in the header box several areas to click on to select. If you click on the "Donate" link button this message will appear: 

Help us to release the Cicret App and the Cicret Bracelet!

  • We need €300,000 euros ($246,000) to develop the CICRET APP on all the platforms.
  • We need €700,000 euros ($574,000) to finish the first prototype of the CICRET BRACELET.

So feel free to donate an amount of your choice. If everyone gives us 1 euro, we will make it ($820,000) and release our products!

(€1 euro = $.82 as of 01/01/2015)

For a donation, fill in the form below.

Do NOT support this with any donations.

1. This is not a concept video, it's everything made in CGI, Computer Generated Imagery, and other special effects graphics programs to appear as a real viable working product to unknowing people about this newest revolutionary technologic idea.

2. It is impossible to show a light image on skin outside in the sunlight, for this to become possible, the "bracelet projector bulb" would have to be brighter and stronger than the actual sun itself, which could possibly vaporize your eyes and skin, cause skin cancer and burn your arm--think of all of the computer projectors that have difficulty being seen with their powerful lights in bright rooms too.

3. Any white color or similar light colors, would show as invisible on your skin, in this video they showed white background when surfing on the internet etc. which is completely incorrect. I saw only light skin Cicret users; so how about if you have black or dark skin, doesn't that figure into this imagining technology too?

4. This entire so called "project" is a quick scam to milk money out of the ignorant people. So, the best thing you could do is report this to PayPal and inform them about how this fraud going on in hopes of people being warned or possibly getting their money refunded back.

https://www.paypal.com/us/webapps/helpcenter/helphub/article/?solutionId=FAQ2422&topicID=&m=ARA 

5. Microtechnology is not advanced yet that anyone could fit their specifications into a tiny bracelet, such as GPU, CPU, RAM, Memory etc.

6. You may have failed to notice that when you would place your finger in front of the bracelet's projector window, it should be overlapped with a shadow on the image screen, just like when you're walking in front of a projector or a cinema screen. Projecting an image from such a low angle would be massively difficult at best if not outright impossible. The slightest bump in the skin would grossly distort or even block the image and don't forget to exfoliate your hair too.

7. Even if this was real and they had the technology to do it, but required money to do so, Google, Samsung, Apple etc. would pay huge amount of money to own/collaborate with this "company" called Cicret. Even other investors like Amazon and Facebook would be falling over each other to invest money into this idea since it has never been done before. Do you people see any of this happening in the news? No, because it's fake and a scam.

Credit: Various other blog site commenters with many insightful shared ideas.

If it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is just that--Not true!

Friday
Dec262014

What do G.I. Joe, Santa's Elf & Terrorists share?

I was sent a holiday seasons picture depicting a GI Joe action figure at a kitchen sink faucet waterboarding an Elf with a face cloth to find out what presents Santa was bringing. A very clever come-back by a liberal reader that saw it was, "Remove the aerator and give Mr. Terrorist Brownie a good ol’ dose of American justice!" That was meant to be a funny line in itself, but it became biting political commentary when he added a picture of Vice President Dick Cheney beside it. 

"Remove the aerator!"--It resonates like, "Hands Up, Do Not Shoot!" as phrases that further blur to distort solid reasons surrounding actions and diminish protections too. Both headlines had tabloid blow-back about the defense of U.S. residents that protected them from domestic and foreign bad guys. Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO out on bail awaiting a September 2014 trial for a November 2013 armed burglary, was again wanted in August, 2014 as a strong-arm robbery suspect and was shot and killed as he first attacked an officer in his car and then came back on him like a running freight train.

Terrorist Khalid Sheikh MohammedTerrorists Abu Zubaydah, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri were subjected to "water conditioning procedures" to extract terrorist attack plans. James Mitchell, a former U.S. Air Force psychologist, confirmed that the waterboarding of Mohammed, which the Senate report erroneously said occurred 183 times, was actually "83 pours (of water) that lasted between one to 10 seconds” each. This is hardly anything like any ISIS brutal beatings, severed body parts, decapitated heads that they have as preferred torture methods.

Obviously, the magnitude of these two situations are different, but both as news items are measured by the perception of crisis levels on how public opinion reacts. They were both considered by the mainstream press as national concerns, affecting everyone equally in their daily lives. There were 130 out of nearly 14 Million Blacks that were killed by police in 2013 according to FBI statistics, the numbers that Eric Holder himself reports, I accept them as fact. I think the Centers for Diseases Control, CDC, in Atlanta have really more alarming statistics as they reported: 

Statistics: Blacks were 55% of shooting homicide victims in 2010, but 13% of the population. ...May 21, 2013 ... from firearm injuries, mainly through suicide (19,392) and homicide (11,078), according to CDC compilation of data from death certificates.  Whoa! ...Suicides? ...Homicides, mostly Black on Black? So just who does the Justice Department really worry about gun controls for as Blacks kill themselves?
​CDC: Black suicide/homicide gun.

By contrast, whites are underrepresented; whites were 25% of the victims of gun homicide in 2010, but 65% of the population. For Hispanics, the 17% share of gun homicide victims was about equal to their 16% proportion of the total population.

Factoid: A high-performance faucet aerator can reduce faucet water use by 77%. It only permits a flow of 0.5 gallons of water per minute when most houses do not have pressure regulators which can affect water flow capacity too. Otherwise, unrestricted flows can Assume Average Pressure. (20-100PSI) about 12f/s flow velocity equals 14 gallons of water per minute. [Of course, this is useless trivia since terrorist interrogators just use a bucket of water.]

If we are waterboarding any individuals, they are humanely conducting this "water-conditioning procedure" with maximum discomfort while affording those individuals "time-out moments" to rethink over sharing their ideas or having conversations.

How many of these tortured individuals ended up dead after such methods were used? Can anyone count how many of our dead citizens due to terrorists were in the 2000 USS Cole soldiers attacked in Yemen, 9/11/01 U.S. plane crashes, U.S. soldiers in 1983 Beirut barracks bombing, U.S. soldiers fighting since 2001 in Afghanistan or 2003 in Iraq or American reporters and foreign aide workers? 


Friday
Dec122014

Ready to Give Up To Obama Your Internet Freedom?

The Obama administration has announced September 2015 as the end to U.S. stewardship of the open Internet; Russia and China will really take advantage of that American ICANN surrender too. Authoritarian regimes want to grab control recognizing the "different modes and methods in Internet management"--code for a major subversion of the Internet and restriction to freedom of speech. 

Meanwhile, even though it is solely under the control of the U.S. Congress who voted down in both houses to give up ICANN controls, Obama is stealthily trying to pass his 'Executive Order' on the down-low and bypass congressional oversight once again; it will be far from the 'modest change in policy' that Obama claimed in March, 2014--another lie!  

Is Obama really aware of the major damages? Of course not, he is again clueless!--But how many more times must the public take that silly "clueless excuse?" It's time that everyone must finally just admit he really does know what he is doing! - Obama is a hardcore Socialist always ready to lie to promote his one-world government progressive ideals for wealth redistribution.      

Secretly, behind closed doors, the nations of the world had been negotiating an International Internet Treaty — initiated by Russia and China — to regulate theHu Jintao & Vladmir Putin Internet through an United Nations agency, the ITU, International Telecommunications Union. It was a boring highly technical meeting largely ignored by the press corps. The only reason anyone knows about these talks in the first place is through a "WikiLeaks anonymous posting" by a participant in the talks. That and the fact that in the signing ceremony in Dubai in December 2012, it was conducted in which Secretary of State Clinton had attended.

Thankfully the U.S. in this round of meetings did not sign any accords to give up any hard fought Internet sovereignty to thuggish authoritarian regimes like China and Russia. The internal political pressures on Washington have China & Russia agree on a U.N. International Telecommunication Union Agency to regulate the Internet.
been great to keep the Internet ICANN organization under U.S. control and from Billionaire software moguls, "Big Bucks" Obama donors, like Larry Page of Google, Bill Gates of Microsoft, Mark Zuckerburg of Facebook and Larry Ellison of Oracle. However, that still does not guarantee the future under Barack Obama if he has anything to do with it if he so desperately grabs at any major legacy he can hang his hat on so late in a failed lame-duck administration--these are desperate times requiring even more desperate measures and consequences to Obama don't really matter much, except to our freedoms. 

Everyone, worldwide too, will feel all the laws, restrictions & tax levies as the price they will pay when overseen by just another corrupt U.N. Regulatory Agency. It is nearly a guaranteed outcome when a stacked houseful of hungry, poorer members nations who greedily set up and collect their excessive access fees create a type of International third-world restricted Internet service program.

Vladamir Putin & Hillary Clinton

Has anyone asked Hillary about the details or her part in this little hidden disingenuous peccadillo of activities in her Secretary of State resume?

Now let's go forward to December 12, 2014, after the Russian government has cracked down on Internet Freedom rights. Google, Inc. have closed their search engineering offices upon being concerned about the safety of its staff in Russia should Google run afoul of the new Russian laws. Google will still maintain sales, user support, business partnerships, marketing and training. But why did they close you ask?

"Russia is one of the rare markets where Google doesn’t dominate the search sector. Yandex NV has long been number one, even though Google recently has been gaining ground. Yandex NV held 59.6% of the Russian search market in November, down from 61.9% a year earlier, according to Liveinternet.ru. Google, meanwhile, captured 31.7% in November, up from 26.4% a year earlier."

In the overall Russian Internet search market shares, the 31.7% capture by Google increased by an impressive 5.30% in just over a year. It appears the government regulators did not want to risk further embarrassment for any more erosion of their market sector share of Yandex NV dissolving under their iron-fisted control of Internet activities.

Another domestic issue was the civil unrest in Russia which is always a concern of a totalitarian government. Recently Russia had a rebellion that Putin and his cronies blamed was brought about and coordinated through the Internet social media. Putin further blamed the Western countries, specifically the U.S., for harboring and releasing these cyber-attacks inside the Russian borders too.

The Kremlin signed into Russian law their oppressive Internet regulations governing data-handling practices by Internet companies:

  • All bloggers with 3,000 or more daily readers are required to register with the government and provide their home address. The ruling prevents these bloggers from using foul language and forbids them from spreading false information effective August 1, 2014. 
  • All companies are required to store the personal data of all Russian users on servers within Russia. The law set the deadline for compliance as Sept. 1, 2016. Russian lawmakers proposed moving the deadline to Jan. 1, 2015, but the proposal didn’t receive final approval after companies objected. Now lawmakers are proposing a compromise deadline of Sept. 1, 2015. 

Now, government suppression of free speech created an actual exodus of Russian tech startup companies.  It is stark evidence that capitalism is alive and well since many have moved abroad to other countries in Eastern Europe such as the Baltics or to Asia. It has been reported that dozens of companies have closed their Moscow offices and gone to Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia or countries in Asia. These expatriates even admit that the majority of them are happy about moving out of Russia--not good news to Vladmir Putin's ears I'm sure. 

Get Up & Email Your Representatives!

 ~ It is a Non-Partisan Issue ~

~ Americans Owe their Freedom to our Laws - So does the Internet ~

To Email your U.S. Congressional Representatives. 

Click on: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/map Enter your home "Zip Code" and it will list by their Names and Internet sites. Click on to their individual "Official Website" and type into their email message box:"Do Not transfer ICANN to UN" and send--it's that easy and it will take a second to do it too! 

You Are Crazy if You Don't Email Congress!

Please Send this out to your Friends Now!  

 

Thursday
Dec042014

Jury Duty - Is There Racial Prejudice?

I have seen a lot of change over the past fifty years in U.S. civil rights and how all people are treated today. In the past 50 years, the rate of black Americans killed by police has dropped 70 percent. With all the countries around the world I have travelled to, you cannot ever show me how any other country is a greater place to live. We, the people, live under the U.S. Constitutional rules of law which offer us the greatest individual freedom. So contrary to the headlines about the White-Black racial divide, read what are the real statistics.   

  • In 2012, 123 African-Americans were shot dead by police. There are currently more than 43 million blacks living in the U.S.A. In 2012, 326 whites were killed by police bullets. Those are the latest stats available.
  • In 2013, blacks committed 5,375 murders in America; whites committed 4,396. Whites comprise 63 percent of the population; blacks 13 percent. So, anyone -- anyone thinking clearly can see that the homicide rate among blacks way out of proportion thus, the police intrusion into black precincts. Since, in a whopping 90 percent of black homicides, the dead person is another black or the offender himself.

Because of all the demagoguery on how racial our jury system is, I am writing this article to let others look into what a sequestered jury in an isolated room sees and how they make their decisions to arrive at their final verdict. It was not a scripted Perry Mason or Matlock TV show with perfect plots revealing everything or even having complete answers to all open questions before a final verdict either, but it certainly was a real life lesson in how our legal system under Constitutional Laws affords every citizen due process. I do encourage everyone to serve as a juror to see firsthand how objectively law is conducted as fairly as humanly possible.

I served as the jury foreman and just signed off on the verdict document for a criminal case in a felony trial that convicted the defendant. It was not a slam dunk, easy decision process as twelve people were attempting to become one in their final decision to unanimously decide a defendant's fate.

Behind the closed doors of the jury room, due process of law works. During our deliberations process all jury members, Americans living within a racially diverse culture, never promulgated nor mentioned it and was not in any deference to the defendant either--it was a moot point. The volume of physical evidence, testimony by several witnesses, points of law and jury instructions truly focused our ultimate decision. We were there to determine the merits based on just facts in the case.

We examined the inconsistencies and flaws of the case from both sides, the defense and the prosecutor. On weighing the details, we discovered omissions of evidence or facts that were holes in the State's arguments which were questionable to allow reasonable doubt of the charge made. It lead to a logical conclusion that the Prosecutor was either directed by the court or a point of law to deliberately prevent certain evidence to be presented to the jury; i.e., past criminal records, allowable testimony by witnesses or lines of questioning leading to the jury to consider incomplete information. One glaring realization popped up; it was not a neat, tidy TV Courtroom drama with all of the facts laid out for the right or wrong decision--this was reality TV on steroids.

In our desire to maintain balance, in review of the Defense attorney's case presented the alleged suspect was not the defendant. It was claimed that another party was solely responsible for the crime of vehicular theft who then gave his keys over and lent the vehicle to the defendant who mistakenly believed the party was the legal owner. As the defendant took the stand, the Defense attorney noted he was taking the stand, which is not required or any admission of guilt if not taken. The defendant answered all his questions forthrightly and seemingly honest too.

During the Prosecutor's cross-examination, however, a serious breakdown occurred. The defendant could not offer the vehicle owner's last name or whereabouts, a key witness's full name or address, a cousin's name corroborating an alibi and a solid timeline account without questionable lapses. Since criminal records were allowable evidence, the prosecutor in cross examination of the defendant asked about his three prior felony convictions. He admitted to these prior felony convictions too. They were objected by his defense attorney, acknowledged by the judge and overruled to be allowed to stand in evidence in his testimony. It offered the jury an opportunity to evaluate further the defendant's moral turpitude and character in assessing his veracity on the witness stand while he was testifying.   

Our jurist instructions directed we jurors to not tweet, blog, IM, Google, Facebook, discuss anything to anybody or even to fellow jurors until jury deliberations and then, only then, after the case has been decided and adjudicated with our final verdict all findings are public record open to all discussions.

I did not hear or see any jurors who broke their solemn oath to uphold their word to defend the law, we all relied on just the evidence as it was presented in court.  

In the first polling around the table, eight were for guilty and four were for not guilty. It was at that point, and for the next two hours, that after exhaustive views proffered by all, lengthy debates and two more polls taken that distilled our decision down to a guilty verdict, "Beyond a reasonable doubt." 

I stood up in court and gave out the verdict from the jury box to the bailiff who199th District Court - McKinney, TX passed it over to the Judge to read. Needless to say, the defendant was glaring and staring me down while the verdict was read as I looked right into his bloodshot, red eyes. He then slowly sat down, put down his elbows on the table and buried his face into his open hands while woefully shaking his head. 

After the trial I was informed about his rap sheet that went back over twenty years but only the past ten years was admitted into evidence about all of his prior violations, incarcerations and fines. Due to rules about prejudicial facts not directly related to the current case any past litigations and motions allowed to establish the accused defendant's past is only limited to the current past decade during the trial proceedings or in front of a jury. In general, any past criminal actions can tarnish any defendant's credible personal integrity about telling the truth. Any older facts also could deny a defendant's right to a fair trial if not based on just the facts in the current alleged crime that he is specifically accused of committing on the pending trial docket.

FYI: At the Colin County, Texas Courthouse I observed that all ethnicities, ages, genders, backgrounds, education and income levels were represented in this American judicial due process of law. It included everyone like the sheriff's deputies providing security, jury room and office staff assisting in selection and the courtroom bailiff who was extremely accommodating in allowing the jury to discharge its duties uninterrupted. 

Our jurist, the Honorable Judge Angela Tucker was a woman, black, intelligent adjudicator who conducted a well ordered court room with the proper decorum, dignity and respect that our Constitutional legal system deserves.

Mr. Chris Fredericks, Asst. D.A. Prosecutor, and Mr. Mark O'Brian Jr., Defense attorney, presented an amalgam of evidence that offered defendant testimony, character witnesses, physical evidence, victim testimony and relevant facts that would affect our jury decision. They were professionals who clearly represented both sides fairly in the case while allowing each side to be heard. We the jury, therefore, legitimately decided a just verdict.

On our panel of jurors was a genial group with diverse views, strong opinions and sharp, critical thinking skills. They autopsied the case and dissected under a microscope the facts, evidence and legal conclusions postulated by the defense and prosecution to determine if the charges were correct as charged.

Now, see what we, the jury, were presented with as evidence and the facts we relied upon to render our verdict. 


Arrested: Patrick Deyone Lee

DOB: 09/08/1972 

Gender: Male
Race: Black
Date Arrested: 11/13/2013
County Arrested: Collin, TX
Other Information: A Police Field Unit arrested Patrick Deyone Lee on Wednesday, 11/13/2013 at 10:30 am at a traffic stop while actively being tracked by GPS from Dallas to Plano after the vehicle he was driving was reported stolen in Dallas at 7:00 am on the same morning. The vehicle was physically first spotted by Plano police officers as it was slowly exiting a back alley behind residential homes onto a residential street.

The arrestee stated that a Mike, aka Black, no known surnames, had been been paid twenty dollars for gas by Patrick Lee to use said vehicle during the morning hours to be returned by noon and gave him the keys. The vehicle had no signs of damage due to broken glass, ignition wires jump-started or any tampered steering lock column that lead Patrick Lee to believe Mike wasn't the owner. Patrick Lee said his own vehicle needed brake shoes which prevented him from driving it and that morning he just checked prices at an Auto Zone store to buy them for a local mechanic to repair his car brakes. 

The arrestee further offered to arresting officers that during that morning he was driving around Plano neighborhoods for over an hour attempting to locate a Kim, no known surnames. Kim was a co-worker of Patrick Lee's fiancée, Kimberly, who worked at a senior health care home services company who promised Patrick Lee a list of her elderly clients who could possibly hire him for handyman jobs or lawn maintenance services.

Patrick Lee also stated that after his single visit one week earlier with his fiancée, he could only recall Kim had a one story brick house with a pickup parked out front in the driveway off a major street in an unfamiliar city since he had maybe driven through it three or four times ever. There was no known address or phone numbers for Kim available because he lost Kim's numbers in his cell phone directory. The police requested to examine his cell phone and discovered it had no directory setup for anyone indicating his questionable claim of storing Kim's number. Furthermore, he was driving over unannounced in hopes of seeing Kim so she could not be called to corroborate any appointment to explain his presence in that Plano neighborhood that day.

Patrick Lee's mother and fiancée, Kimberly, who he lived with corroborated at the trial the defendant's timeline for that morning. He drove his mother to work at 6:30 am, returned home and watched TV with Kimberly until 8:30 am and picked up loaner car at 9:00 am from Mike or Black.

Earlier that morning Patrick Lee's mechanic who lived nearby testified he saw Black in the car and was impressed with the aftermarket chrome wheels and stereo sound system; even Kimberly testified they lived in a quiet apartment nearby too with many elderly and thought it out of place to hear loud music and looked out her window to see the boosted car with shiny wheels and boom box speakers blasting. Their testimonies indicated that this car was new to them, to their neighborhood and to Black which meant he, the owner, newly acquired the vehicle. The mechanic further testified of talk on doing the brake repair with Patrick Lee; but to date has not fixed it.

The true owners of the said vehicle did not know any Mike or Black, Kim, Patrick Lee or Kimberly. The owners or others did not witness this criminal act of auto theft with any suspect involved or during the commission of the alleged crime. The owner had started his vehicle engine to warm it up in front of his house, left the keys in the ignition and ran back inside for a cup of coffee only to return to find it stolen. The owners, however, during the morning in question did not give any permission to anyone to drive their motor vehicle. So, the Penal Code offense charged was in fact: Theft, Unauthorized Use of a Vehicle, a state jail felony level, 31.01 PC statute. It's a state jail felony if the value of the service stolen is $1,500 or more but less than $20,000.

The exact statute reads as follows: 

Sec. 31.07. UNAUTHORIZED USE OF A VEHICLE.
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly operates another's boat, airplane, or motor-propelled vehicle without the effective consent of the owner.
(b) An offense under this section is a state jail felony. 
  • Two "Points of Law" that, we, the Jury had to consider in this case: In this section of law, the statute uses the phrase “without effective consent of the owner." This is a straight-forward fact that the owner had given consent. This language, however, also raises the possibility of "a mistake of fact defense." This law means: If the defendant subjectively and reasonably believes he or she had consent to take the property, the defense could be applicable.--Patrick Lee, therefore, implies that he relied upon by Mike or Black's action to give him the car keys that the vehicle was his to loan out for the twenty dollars. 

Court Proceedings and Findings

The entire scenario presented by Patrick Lee during the course of the evidence presented was debunked by the Prosecutor, the Defendant's own testimony and his witnesses. It was "proven beyond a reasonable doubt" he was guilty as charged: 

  • There's no proof of Mike or Black ever residing where the car was picked up.
  • Car keys taken explain absence of broken windows or hot-wired ignition.  
  • Allegedly Mike or Black moved to New Orleans 11/13/2013, never to return.
  • Due to no provable owner's consent, "Mistake of Fact Defense" was negated.
  • No brake repairs were done even while waiting on bail for a year for the trial.
  • No Kim never came forward to say she offered Patrick Lee work references.
  • Suspicions raised on aimless mid-week, morning cruises in residential area.  
  • Patrick Lee's timeline allowed periods to steal and drive away vehicle.
  • The owners "did not give permission to anyone" to drive their motor vehicle.
  • Patrick Lee admitted he was a convicted felon on three past counts.

Punishment Phase:

It was conducted by the Honorable Angela Tucker, the presiding judge, and the defendant, Patrick Lee, pled TRUE to all counts.  Punishment was assessed 5 years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice system. 

Post Trial Information: 

Note: These are the three prior felony convictions cited in the trial phase; however, this listing does not include previous records of past arrests, convictions, sentences and incarcerations. It was further disclosed afterwards that the defendant's criminal record spanned twenty years which included burglary and assault as well as other infractions of the law.

Date Arrested: 07/14/2009

County Arrested: Dallas
Other Information: The Fugitive Unit arrested Patrick Deyone Lee at a parole office in Dallas on a warrant issued by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Parole Board on June 26, 2009, for a parole violation for absconding from a halfway house. Lee was sentenced to five years in prison after being convicted in 1996 in Dallas County of sexual assault of a child, a 16-year-old girl. At the time of his July 14, 2009, arrest, Lee was on parole for failure to comply with sex offender registration requirements in the Dallas County case. Lee was sentenced to three years in prison after being convicted in 2007 for the registration violation.

Information current as of 2012-12-04 14:06:41

Date Arrested: After 2013-01-01 (Approx.)

County Arrested: Dallas

Other Information: Patrick Deyone Lee had been arrested and charged as a felon carrying a concealed weapon.


Monday
Dec012014

You Are All Certifiably Insane About the Internet!

Are you all nuts??


 

 

How loud should a cry be to wail loudly enough to be heard? - Your lives are going to be CHANGED FOREVER if Obama gets his way! - NO LIE! 


  • Do you all realize that if you think the NSA, National Security Agency, scandal was intrusive in monitoring your emails, phone calls and text messages by the United States government then you haven't considered a global U.N. bureaucracy that will have power to reject any nation's citizen's ability to say, "No!", to Internet monitoring and content bans. - Scary? Oh, it's going to happen fast too!
  • Do you all realize that if you think the Somali pirates taking ships and crews as hostages to exact "fees" and "just tolls" through their waters was extortion implicit in allowing safe passage and controlling strategic territories past their own weapons then you haven't considered a United Nations that has long craved for the power to tax all Internet traffic over the world-wide-web of seas of information while users are navigating around the U.N. software censorship mines?  

As far back as 2001, a U.N. report, "Financing the Global Sharing Economy," proposed that the U.N. be given authority to levy a tax on "speculative currency transactions" with a projected revenue stream north of $150 billion. Should the U.N. get control of the Internet, $150 billion will be "chump change" growing into $Trillions to go into the United Nations treasury, International Banks and pockets of crooked U.N. Directors and Member nations.  

It would enable a chokehold on the global economy and a vast stream of revenue that would make the U.N. even more unaccountable than it already is now. All this would start out modestly with a fee, never called "a tax," maybe a small transaction fee for certain types of traffic. But if history is any guide, the run-up to big dollars will be stunningly rapid. One need only reference the increases in U.S. federal revenues and expenditures after passage in 1913 of the 16th Amendment establishing the federal income tax. The top 1913 rate of 7% more than doubled by 1916 to 15%, then rocketed to 67% in 1917 and 77% in 1918. It always starts small--AND never ends!

Power follows the money, and bureaucratic appetites are voracious. Who will there be to stop the process, after all? Where is the elected legislative body that will answer to the world's population that finally pays these "fees"? Among the many disingenuous justifications being touted for this colossal strategic mistake is that 'No Government Control' will be imposed on the Internet--BULLSHIT! --What does the 'One World Global Body,' the U.N. Government agency, call itself then?

Can anyone doubt that within just the next few decades the Internet will be the essential infrastructure for participation in even the smallest segment of the global economy? The revenue potential associated with controlling the "rivers" of the 21st-century-and-beyond will be enormous and will finance an ever-expanding international bureaucracy, likely under the aegis of the United Nations.

Get Off Your Asses & Email Your Representatives!

 ~ It is a Non-Partisan Issue ~

~ Americans Owe their Freedom to our Laws -  So does the Internet ~

To Email your U.S. Congressional Representatives. 

Click on: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/map Enter your home "Zip Code" and it will list by their Names and Internet sites. Click on to their individual "Official Website" and type into their email message box: "Do Not transfer ICANN to UN" and send--it's that easy and it will take a second to do it too! 

You Are Crazy if You Don't Email Congress!

Please Send this out to your Friends Now!