Navigation
SEARCH BOX - USE KEY WORDS, NAMES, OR PHRASES.

866-391-6593

Call For Quote

or Click Link!

  •   Build Your Brand
  •       with KLAS!
CODAmeds®

CODAmeds® Dispensers

Manage pills & supplements

« "Beam Me Up Scotty" has a New Meaning | Main | Mark Levin vs. Obama Energy Policies »
Sunday
Mar112012

2012 Obama Re-Election Campaign in Full Tilt

After dragging the Catholic faith through the political mud this past month, the Obama White House has been setting up voters to see his "religious side" as he tackles the Obamacare issue in the Supreme Court.  I caution you all to take notes on the tactics below and be aware that "you ain't seen nothing yet" in this highly destructive, very demeaning manipulation of the voters in this 2012 Presidential Election.

 

 

Government White House Organizes…Prayer Vigil for Obamacare Outside Supreme Court

 

As the White House struggles to garner support for Obamacare as it approaches Supreme Court arguments on the new health care law, the administration is not leaving anything to chance — not even forces from heaven above.

Yes, on Wednesday, March 7, White House officials reportedly called on dozens of nonprofit leaders to aid them in organizing a prayer vigil outside the court – right when justices plan to hear arguments for three days beginning March 26.

In a push that hopes to shape public opinion on the issue at the very center of the battle for the White House and Congress, advocates and officials set their strategy to win favor in motion. White House officials, however, deny they are trying to influence others or garner support by facilitating rallies outside the Supreme Court.

The New York Times adds:

"At the White House meeting on Wednesday, a wide range of advocates representing consumers and people with diseases and disabilities — as well as doctors and nurses, labor unions and religious organizations — discussed plans to bolster the landmark law, which is being challenged by 26 states as unconstitutional."

"Supporters of the law plan to hold events outside the court on each day of oral argument. The events include speeches by people with medical problems who have benefited or could benefit from the law. In addition, supporters will arrange for radio hosts to interview health care advocates at a “radio row,” at the United Methodist Building on Capitol Hill."

“The White House was very encouraging and supportive of our activities,” said Ronald F. Pollack, executive director of Families USA.

Pollack said the theme of the Supreme Court events would be, “Protect our health care, protect the law.”

The Rest of the Story

 

In 2008, Families USA was worth a cool $45 million dollars. Not bad for a company with only a few employees.  Maybe they should go public?  With a P/E ratio like that, their price would make Google look like a pennystock.

Families USA also took in over $8,000,000 that year, and over $10,000,000 the year prior.  That's some serious fundraising for an organization that lacks an event coordinator and warehouse of cocktail napkins.

In front of you, you have an official IRS Form 990 evidence of a non-profit, tax-exempt foundation with unknown funding ...Who are they?

 

Who funds them, and who builds up their assets to such a large degree?

We aren't allowed to know, but we can guess. Let's take a look at their board of directors, and who do we see on it, but Mary Kay Henry, the new president of SEIU.

Fascinating that they are clearly allied with the healthcare unions who stand to benefit greatly from Obamacare.

 So, Families USA is a union front group. This is how the unions like SEIU, Service Employees International Union, get around disclosure requirements. They set up organizations like this, fund it with union dues, and then tell it to advocate for liberal causes. Since the front group is "non-partisan" the unions can use coerced dues money and don't have to exempt political objectors."

 

~  REMEMBER... 

 VOTE 2012!  ~

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (2)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>