Navigation
SEARCH BOX - USE KEY WORDS, NAMES, OR PHRASES.

866-391-6593

Call For Quote

or Click Link!

  •   Build Your Brand
  •       with KLAS!
CODAmeds®

CODAmeds® Dispensers

Manage pills & supplements

« Obama IRS Scandal: 2nd Verse Worst as the 1st! | Main | Obama IRS Audit Taxes The Real Truth »
Monday
Jun232014

Obama Gets Bad Spanking in Middle East

Does ISIS have a De Facto Status of Forces Agreement?

 الدولة الاسلامية في العراق والشام


Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki did not sign a Status of Forces Agreement with Obama who insiders say would not push for it since that would have allowed the U.S. to stay to fight the al Qaeda; Obama wanted to leave. So did the terrorists, ISIS, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,  need an agreement instead? Appears it's not required, since a de facto, in fact, agreement has been established by the terrorist themselves without any threat of criminal prosecution by the opposition Iraqi authorities. Now we have the specter of a radical theocracy governed by sharia law wherever ISIS gains control. 

The execution of Iraqi soldiers by ISIS extremists in the Salaheddin province, Iraq.

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton served from 2009 through 2013 as Obama's close advisor for International Affairs. On February 27, 2009 at Camp Lajeune, NC Obama announced to the marines his withdrawal of combat forces from Iraq by August 2010 and all remaining troops by December 2011. Since then, Obama announced in June, 2014 of a complete withdrawal as of 2015.

Nouri al-Maliki's Shiite government facing the upcoming U.S. troop withdrawals feverishly started shoring up strained domestic Shiite support. It was politically devastating as it further isolated Iraq's Sunni and Kurdish minorities by the oppressive, corrupt Iraqi military actions. 

Here are more facts: 

  • The Iraqi government actions lead to an entirely foreseeable sectarian war that boiled up for past two years and finally erupted now.
  • The ongoing U.S. troop reductions and withdrawal date of closing down boots-on-the-ground operations greatly diminished Iraqi resolve to fight for the al-Maliki government. 
  • A huge major flaw in the Iraqi defense troops was known by al-Maliki, Obama and Hillary Clinton too.  According to Colonel Peter Mansoor, Advisor to General David Petraeus, the Iraqi army had a 40% 'phantom soldier' rate, a no-show U.S. paid empty uniform subsidy, that the corrupt al-Maliki government stole for themselves. Iraq is not fighting with a full fighting force, only 60% as show-ups. 
  • The U.S. failed at Iraqi troop building due to the untimely Obama withdrawal dates. Colonel Peter Mansoor, Advisor to General David Petraeus, reported that our U.S. military exercises trained Iraqi soldiers to fight at a 'company level' of 200 and at a 'battalion level' of 1000 men. At the point of our own soldiers withdrawal this training was capped off at this battalion level and never went to the next level which was to combine several battalions together to form brigades. This level included supplies logistics as well as field personnel combat deployment for large army contigencies. This was the optimum fighting level that Iraqis needed to be at in protecting themselves to repell invaders or attack aggressers with like size brigades.

Why did Obama, his close advisors and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton turn a blind eye to all of these obvious warning signs and then further ignore the Iraqi ethnic divisiveness and the ultimate strategic military outcomes?

--How about Obama and Hillary just simply not knowing anything about anything except on how to be politicians running for office? 

With Knowledge Comes Wisdom

 

Copyright 2013 DoubledayMany people have seen the film classic, Lawrence 'OF' Arabia. Apparently no one has read the history book, "Lawrence 'IN' Arabia".  It's a very well written fact based history book about the tumultuous middle East evolving at the turn of the twentieth century, from 1890 through to the late 1920's. It is the quintessential Middle East primer about its geography, people, powers, politics, religions, wars and how their outcomes ultimately affected the world today, one hundred years later.

It reads like a spy thriller. All of the plot twists and turns of a real who-done-it with multiple intrigues turn into could-a, would-a, should-a, done-it scenarios that ultimately point to many decisions with consequences that doom the Middle-East to its present future in 2014 and beyond.  

The book is based on years of primary document research. It's written by Scott Anderson, a veteran war correspondent with the New York Times and other major publications. He has traveled from Bosnia, Sudan, Egypt, El Salvador, Lebanon, Israel, Northern Ireland, Chechnya and other strife-torn countries. Understand from a 'first-person' view point of the Middle East issues from all sides - Pick it up and read it!

To Order Your Book:  Click on the Amazon Store in left side-bar.

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>