Obama State of the Onion ...Err Union Speech

Lie Witness News - State of the Union Edition

I have to give Jimmy Kimmel more kudos again as he peels back the onion to expose the absolute stupidity of the American electorate and why Obama was elected and is still revered.  These idiots are voters ...and liars too?  Wow!

President Obama's State of The Union speech had not yet taken place when Jimmy Kimmel's interviewers asked these people what they thought of it, but that didn't stop them from weighing in.

Time: 04:34

The Self-Evident Truth - Obama's Denial

Gun Control vs. Crime Control

Bill Whittle Bio: Bill is a popular commentator and widely read blogger whose common-sense perspective brings together everyone's core values and beliefs into evaluating topical issues. His delivery, as well as factual content, is not only informative but entertaining. Bill never disappoints viewers, he provokes ideas and a lot of thoughtful discourse.

Time: 7:24

Bill Whittle in his Virtual State of the Union, as the Virtual President he talks about why politicians want to talk about gun control rather than crime control, and delivers the factual evidence and historical truths that make the case for the Second Amendment self-evident.

Update on Friday, January 10, 2014 at 10:07AM by D.K. Dickey

Gun Control vs. Crime Control

LETTER TO EDITOR RESPONSE - YOU DECIDE

Dilbert certainly "tells it like it is" in this hysterical cartoon strip about workplace life and the people in it. Thousands of readers identify with their own daily situations which makes them laugh even harder.  

I have recently received an email comment on my video on January 9, 2014 about The Self-Evident Truth - Obama's Denial  It illustrates "Ignorance" as a reader's point of view.

First, my liberal reader first openly admits he has not "read" my article, not realizing it was a video content. He is running out blathering his opinion based on nothing he read in my blog. Second, he states that the "NRA takes the second amendment out of context and he never heard the NRA mention that citizens are required to join a militia under the control of the governor." (no such militia conscription requirement) So, he shows his "ignorance" as a typical TV in-between commercials, 5 second sound-bite, liberal type of a guy. In his rhetorical gunfight he shoots from the hip and asks questions later. Please read his email and my response below - make up your own mind.

Reader Email: 

I didn't read the article but i [sic] wonder why all gun nuts only quote the second phrase of the second amendment and never mention well regulated [sic] militia.

The origins of the amendment can be traced to shays [sic] rebellion in Massachusetts and local militias were used by the government to put down the whiskey rebellion.   Prior to the civil war gun ownership was very limited and was promoted by the arms manufacturers to keep their factories operating upon the conclusion of the civil war. 

The NRA takes the second amendment out of context and I have never heard a word about requiring gun owners to join a well regulated [sic] militia under the control of the governor.  Wait, that's the national guard. [sic]

My Response:

 

Actually, the NRA and gun advocates have brought the individual and militia claims up to the higher courts. Believe it or not courts have been conflicted as late as 2003 with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals supporting for an individual right and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals supporting for a collective right as a militia to bear arms in their decisions.

 

Although no court has concluded that the original intent underlying the Second Amendment supports a claim for both an individual and a collective rights based interpretation of the right to bear arms, the compelling historical arguments marshaled on both sides of the debate would suggest that another court faced with the same debate may reach such a conclusion in the future. They are both correct and it further supports all individuals' rights to bear arms.

                                                                                                                      

One last point, I think you should review the video as it is a well balanced and measured debate that is presented. Hanging gun owners with a pejorative such as "gun nuts"  attacks their legitimate claims to bear arms under the U.S. Constitution.  I have been around guns all my life and have never used them in defense, but it lends a peace of mind that I am trained and ready to handle firearms if required.

 

Regards,

 

Is it any wonder why our country is so screwed up and these people simply attack, berate and vilify any conservative without any facts?  -- Just go view MSNBC and CNN for "the news" and you understand their fact sources. 

Obama Choice for 2016 Prez Petitions

Presidential Endorsement

Obama Supporters sign fake petition supporting 'Karl Marx For President in 2016' as the Candidate for the Democrat Party after repeatedly being told 'Obama has endorsed him.' Filmed in July 2013 at the beach in San Diego, California. Featuring Mark Dice.

What do you think of Karl Marx Ticket?

An American Made Kid - We Have Some Great Ones!

Five Year Old Genius Arden Hayes on Jimmy Kimmel Live

Time: 04:54

This is incredible. Adorable five-year-old genius Arden Hayes demonstrates his wealth of knowledge in world geography. If this little boy doesn't make you smile, then you're truly a grinch...! 

If all kids were like this, more people would have more of them. He actually says "thank you". The first few moments are slowest, but stay tuned for an amazing display of the love of knowledge, plus good humor and charm all in one package. Can you imagine being his teacher??? 

How Obama Makes a Monkey out of You

"What happens when you pay two monkeys unequally? Watch what happens"

Time: 02:43   FILMED NOV 2011 • POSTED APR 2012 • TEDxPeachtree

YouTube Review: Frans de Waal - Moral behavior in Animals - "Empathy, cooperation, fairness and reciprocity -- caring about the well-being of others seems like a very human trait. But Frans de Waal shares some surprising videos of behavioral tests, on primates and other mammals, that show how many of these moral traits all of us share."

NOTE: This 'video lesson' is from the site called TED, Technology, Entertainment and Design, which is a very liberal, left-leaning organization. TED is well-known for its annual, invitation-only conference devoted to “ideas worth spreading.” The goal is to 'foster the spread of great ideas' so it can dramatically alter the behavior of the mind's owners. Altruistically as it seems, I highly question the 'great' word description about their 'ideas' which is TED's self-serving slogan to garner undeniable acceptance.

Its participants include Democrat president Bill Clinton, U.K. Labour P.M. Gordon Brown - 3rd worst P.M. since WW2, molecular biologist and Darwinist James D. Watson, physicist and atheist Murray Gell-Mann, Democrat Vice President Al Gore, political scientist Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, liberal Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, Liberal Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, and Green Peace Zoologist Jane Goodall. Many are like-minded "NWO", New World Order, leftist progressive visionaries that are actively working feverishly to change the whole world into a "Global Community" under a one-world government; i.e., like the United Nations.  

Critique: Entertaining lecture! However, I did not share their "wall street" comparisonOccupy Wall Street - Poop on U.S. Flag regarding the unequal pay test even while interjecting it humorously. It is an ideologically skewed experiment. The "occupy" crowd does not perform commensurate work as the corporate crowd, therefore they do not deserve the same "fruits" of labor, no matter how much they may believe they are entitled to them. If one of the monkeys went to college, earned a degree in finance, and became a stock trader to earn his grapes; while the other monkey was given a cucumber by the government for smoking pot and sleeping in a tent in downtown NYC, then I would agree it is comparable pay. The audience seemed to readily react in laughter but without realizing the intellectual seduction. The audience projected human characteristics into the monkey who appeared to reject his reward because the other one got more for the same task. Actually it was not 'why' one got more, but actually 'what' gotten just plain tastes better with no thought to the other monkey's motives, which indicates simply base animal wants. Sadly, with the concepts corrupted, the audience processes these ideas as true tenants for their own values; TED has now altered their behaviors toward more liberal values - more lessons in Socialism for Homo sapien Monkeys!