Web Stealth Tactics - The Obama Assault

OBAMA "Net Neutrality" Internet Laws To Take Effect?

 

By the way, the book’s title is a verbatim quote – in the New York suburb of Hastings-on-Hudson, where to be a conservative was akin to being (the term of general usage at the time for George W. Bush) a Nazi. Somebody said it to the author at one of those dinner parties in the spring of 2008, when he dared to raise the issue of Obama’s lack of experience. So, it just seems to smack in the face of any good liberals that the conservative troglodyte [caveman] always need to be educated about his wayward thinking.  

"Politics makes strange bedfellows"  

Since 1870, the American essayist, Mr. Charles Dudley Warrens observation has not changed for over one hundred and forty-five years. 

Uber-Liberal Billionaire Larry Page, CEO & co-founder of Google, runs the search giant and has been kept busy since September, 2013 deflecting accusations that Google supplied the U.S. government with users' data. Does it appear to be a little tight with the Obama White House? Maybe. I possibly might have gotten a litle glimpse through an unsettling coincidence that just happened with Google.

Without getting too over technical about website software mechanics, I just 'registered' two new Domain names: MyOvalOffice.com and MyBullyPulpit.com; then, I dropped them onto a 'parking page' while I designed my web pages for the new dot com names. In the course of designing my website programs, I tested their dot com addresses by clicking on the hyperlink names to see them go to the 'parking page'. They did work, but I was surprised on what I saw there: 'Obama' websites links were listed all the way down my 'parking' page. This meant that if I had parked my dot com addresses there and then took a month or whatever to develop my website those 'Obama' links would show only 'related links' to liberal Democrat sites. How could this happen?

My website registrar explained that, "Advertising is on all of our 'parking pages', and, "I am sorry, but advertisement cannot be removed from 'parking pages'; and no further explanation was given about the 'why' about that page's 'Ad content'. I realize it is a revenue income stream for the website server provider and that Ads by Google for sponsored links is everywhere too. However, I found it a little difficult to swallow that all of these hyperlink ads were just random picks for Obama topics only while NO conservative or Republican political links were listed at all. It was if the White House owned the Google Ad content and allowed only their approved sites to be shown to the masses. So if I had not paid my money to register my sites, those Obama hyperlinks ads would not have displayed?  Who paid for those ten hyperlinks? Hmn...

And so this is how Obama's 2010 FCC 'net neutrality' law works? So, Yada. Yada, Yada! The law said, "that Internet service providers and governments should treat all data on the Internet equally, not discriminating or charging differentially by user, content, site, platform, application, type of attached equipment, and modes of communication"--yeeah...right!

Bob Kahn, co-inventor of the Internet Protocol [IP], has said, "The term 'net neutrality' [is] a "slogan" and states that he, "opposes establishing it." (The 'IP Address' is what identifies everyone's personal computer location on the Internet.) Thank God that the Obama FCC Law was not passed in 2010, proving again the free marketplace keeps the Internet and cable channels open and available for all. 

Google's official public site information: (Appears innocent enough)

Ever notice "Ads by Google," "Sponsored Links," or the AdChoices icon  as you browse the web? Ads like these show all across the Internet. Advertisers can use AdWords to show Google Ads on sites that are part of the Google Display Network. You may come across such ads when you’re viewing a website, video, or app on Google’s Display Network or other partner sites. [Who makes that decision for ad placements?] In addition to seeing ads based on the types of sites you visit, you may also see ads based on your interests and more. [I certainly saw more than I wanted to see.]

This is what was actually displayed on my 'parking page'--notice any patterns here?

Domain names: MyOvalOffice.com and MyBullyPulpit.com

Related Links

Barack Obama Mailing Address

Barack Obama President

President Barack Obama

President Obama Biography*

About Barack Obama

Obama Biography

Michelle Obama

Obama Muslim

Obama Speech

Obama Office Escape

*Hyperlink Program Code:  http://myovaloffice.com/?ac=2&slt=8&slr=1&lpt=1&query=Obama%20Biography&afdToken=CnYKEwj70fm6zOC8AhWNFOUKHZxxAKgYASAFUIWYoQFQzNOZAlDBoa0pUO65rSlQqPvILFCu34ZgUL_D4GZQ0JTclwFQup7dxQJQp-XC9wJohZihAXFXK_eOp6jb940B8V4xTpEBZXbwrpbKqI2RARTd5C7Q6mTTEhkAnIUCSpU_pGW5Glq5AUmey-pRGZ6kDmF1

Obama's Lame Excuse for Leadership

The Republicans are majority party as Obama has become a "Lame Duck" President. 

The press has hyped this headline as if it were something new, a unique and epic level of partisan animus. Members of the Obama administration also promote it as something new since it assumes no deals with Republicans will be possible. It gives Obama a handy excuse they will now use: "It's not us, they vowed from the beginning they wouldn't work with us!"

But none of this was new. The other side always vows to crush you. Anyone who's been around for a while in Washington knows the opposition always are trying to sound tough, using hyperbole to buck up the troops. It's how they talk when the other guys are on the ropes. The president and his staffers have been around for a while and they understand what they were hearing was par for the course. Sadly the majority of the voting public is too young, preoccupied, uneducated and ill-informed to know these facts; so, they are gullible to easily swallow the idea for executive orders without any objections.

Obama had really put down a red line in the 2014 Midterm elections boasting his policies were on the ballot with the Democrats who would be elected. Instead, the Republicans victoriously crossed over it while the electorate rejected his policies. So is it time for Obama to pull out the pen and sign Presidential Executive Orders for actions to pass more laws and regulations?--Where is the Constitutional Law defining the balance of powers now?

Obama believes that in order to gain any public support in the waning days of his disastrous legacy of a lame duck presidency he must pull out his pen. After all, there is no bipartisan cooperation now. So, he is attempting to write into the history books his Stimulus Programs, Immigration Reforms, War Powers Acts, Monetary Policies and Tax Reforms as laws. Obama's writings are akin to scribbling graffiti on the walls of the bathroom stall for everyone to see but no one really cares to read anyway.  

Bill Clinton's foes made fierce vows about him, the enemies of both Bushes did the same. The opposing party always gets on the phone or gathers in what used to be Georgetown dens to President Reagan & Speaker Tip O'Neill - 1985 at White House denigrate the President and vow to fight him to the end. That's how blowhards blow. When Reagan came in they vowed to take him down, and it was personal. Speaker Tip O'Neill called him "ignorant" and a "disgrace" and said it was "sinful" that he was president. He called Reagan "a man who has no care and no concern for thePolitical Pundit Chris Matthews  working class of America" and said: "He's cold. He's mean. He's got ice water for blood." An O'Neill staffer, now a cable news pundit, Chris Matthews once greeted Reagan in the Capitol with the words: "Mr. President, welcome to the room where we plot against you." They did. President Reagan knew it. Yet he had no problem dealing successfully with O'Neill. He didn't moan, "Oh they hate me, it's no use!" 

In the movie 'Casablanca', as the Nazi's Prefect of Police, Captain Renault raids Rick's Cafe Americain as he shouts, "I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!" - Note to the Obama White House: There's always gambling at Rick's Cafe Americain. It's never a shock and not an excuse. It's business as usual. And if you're a leader you can lead right past it.--Sound like Washington, DC?

"People do what they know how to do," meaning politicians use whatever talent they have, and when it no longer works they continue using it.  Obama, however, has now resorted to "pulling a Bogart" by adopting Bogie's film persona, Rick's attitude of a world-weary resignation at how bad things are and what little he can do about it - "After all, it's the Republican's fault." - Obama is now a Lame Duck! 

*******

CASABLANCA, the 1942 Best Picture Oscar winner - Paul Henreid, Ingrid Bergman& Humphrey Bogart.

In case you are not familiar with Casablanca, the 1942 Best Picture film classic: 

Casablanca - In French-occupied Morocco. American expatriate Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bogart) runs a dive bar called Rick’s and makes money gambling. When his former lover Ilsa (Ingrid Bergman) comes into his bar, all the old feelings of their past relationship in Paris come back to him. Unfortunately, Ilsa and her revolutionary husband Victor Laszlo (Paul Henreid) are trying to get out of the country and are meeting resistance from the Germans and the Prefect of Police Captain Renault (Claude Rains) in his service as a figure of authority of the Nazis. As Rick and Ilsa start to fall back in love, the two are torn at what to do in order to survive.

China Pledges Help in Terrorism Fight

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said, "China seeks to play an active role in Afghan reconstruction and reconciliation."

Boy, those headlines are reassuring, China finally gets it! ...Uh oh, hold on, I thought so, there are some slight wrinkles nearly unnoticeable there in those headlines. It seems it isn't to help the United States, but it's to help Afghanistan. Oh well, it's still a magnanimous gesture towards settling war to bring peace into the region since they share a strategic narrow border. What else could it be, right?--Wrong.

Mao Tse Tung & President NixonThe old saying, "You don't get anything for nothing." is certainly prescient here. It is with that foresight from past Chinese diplomatic encounters since President Richard Nixon discovered that ulterior Mandarin motives always prevail in any Manchurian negotiations. Haven't you ever heard of "saving face"?

Factoid: Afghanistan has asked China on several occasions to open their northern border in the Wakhan Corridor for economic reasons or as an alternative supply route for fighting the Taliban insurgency. Historically, Marco Polo traversed this rugged, deep, narrow valley pass sandwiched between Afghanistan and Chinese provinces considered even today as the only viable land passage in spite of its extremely rugged mountainous terrain. However, China has resisted, largely due to unrest in its far western province of Xinjiang, which borders the Wakhan Corridor that could supply ongoing anti-Beijing anarchists. In December 2009, it was reported that the United States had asked China to open the corridor with no end results. Is that some more of the unreported Obama foreign relations policies successes? 

Afghanistan natural resources: coal, copper, iron ore, lithium, uranium, rare earth elements, chromite, gold, zinc, talc, barites, sulfur, lead, marble, precious and semi-precious stones, natural gas and petroleum. In 2010, U.S. and Afghan government officials estimated that untapped mineral deposits located in 2007 by the US Geological Survey are worth between $900 billion and $3 trillion. 

The biggest find, however, is mining the 1.4 million tons of 'rare earth elements' such as lanthanum, cerium and neodymium in one place. There are 17 rare earth elements which are typically dispersed and not often found concentrated as rare earth minerals in economically exploitable amounts, so that is what is remarkable about Afghanistan.  

 Despite being one of the poorest nations in the world, Afghanistan may be sitting on one of the richest troves of rare earth minerals in the world, valued at nearly $1 trillion. It is in extremely high demand in manufacturing of high tech military hardware, computers and various electronics such as cell phones, television displays and communications which are exponentially growing.

So, China strategically is encouraging new investment of Chinese enterprises to mine these minerals in this land-locked country even with its arid, war-weary devastated countryside from years of Russian occupation with surrounding mountainous terrains. This is really why China is helping to build Afghan anti-terrorism capabilities by training local militia and police with arms and boots on the ground to protect their own national interests such as: 

• In 2007, a Chinese government-owned company paid $3 billion to lease a 2,600-year-old Buddhist site for 30 years and plans to extract over $100 billion worth of copper from the area.

• In 2011, China became the first foreign country in decades to sign a oil exploration deal in Afghanistan when it inked a $7 billion pact.

• In 2013, China announced preliminary talks to construct a direct road link, Wakhan Corridor, to China across the remote 47-mile border between the two countries.

Obama losing shirt in cards with Hu of China.This is part of a trend that has been welcomed by the U.S. officials in the Obama administration. It is interesting that the Obama administration has not raised much fanfare about this U.S. capitulation to the Chinese government by the American people as Afghanistan is bought and paid for by our blood, sweat and treasure. No wonder the Chinese like to deal with the Obama administration.

In the meantime, the United States withdraws its troops as facilities, equipment and municipal infrastructures such as power plants, dams and roads are left behind for the Chinese to use in Afghanistan. After all, China needs them to corner the market on these strategic rare earth minerals to attain military superiority over the United States. Is this another Obama foreign policy blunder or a side deal cut with China to shore up and build up his feeble Obama Presidential diplomatic legacy?

 

U.S. Schools are "Rotten to the Common Core"

In this 2014 Midterm elections, it was about education reformers. Republican Governors Rick Snyder, Michigan; Scott Walker, Wisconsin; Nathan Deal, Georgia; and Sam Brownback, Kansas all cut through a flood of negative campaigning with the American Federation of Teachers Union ads to prevail and win.

It really was a 'textbook' victory for all students to win more than just another election year of empty political promises. It was for conservative programs aimed at improving educational standards. The Federal Government "Common Core" program is an abysmal failure in offering basic education subjects, poor execution of teaching methods and dismal high school graduation numbers results. Our textbooks need to once again start teaching more about American exceptionalism in principles, values and pride about why we are the greatest country in world history, second to none.

The very uber-liberal, progressive, left-wing bullying tactics of the American Federation of Teachers Union literally backfired. Their ad campaigns lied with statistics to support politicians promoting more union job growth along with union dues, burgeoning union benefits programs with more taxpayer supported spending--it was all about more union jobs, not better education curriculums.

The "Big Lie" of the American Federation of Teachers Union: "ThesePrivate Sector Workers under Union Workers tax burdens. governors were for 'cutting' education spending. Some of the examples were blatant like: "Sam Brownback signed the largest single cut in Kansas history." or "Rick Scott took a $1.3 billion sledgehammer to schools." or "Rick Snyder slashed $1 billion from education." or that "Scott Walker was slipping tens of $ millions to those bent on privatizing education along with handouts to businesses and very the wealthy." All of this lying campaign ad rhetoric has since been debunked and has ceased as the electorate who were the consumers of the ads did not buy it, voting all those Republican Governors into office.

Even the North Carolina Republican U.S. Senator, Thom Tillis was accused by outgoing Senator Kay Hagen, who Thom unseated, with unfounded 'phantom education cuts'. Hagan was saying during the campaign, "Thom Tillis' cuts to education hurt No. Carolina students." Rick Scott who championed 'school vouchers' in poor Florida districts with positive results was attacked about that education from V.P. Joanne McCall of the Florida Education Association. McCall warned, "Voucher schools are largely unregulated." and "...are a risky experiment that gambles taxpayer's money and children's lives." Those comments beg one to ask some questions to that Union Vice President:

1. Just who for years has been regulating Florida education full-time while daily those Florida public schools and teachers in the federally funded U.S. education system have gone downhill? 
2. Could it be any of those American Federation of Teachers Union members are responsible? 

--[Cricket Chirps] - [Silence] 

In a U.S. educational system rigged to protect the hierarchical bureaucracy, on the chopping block in ongoing nationwide elections will be education reforms, the red meat that feeds everyone's appetites: the electorate, politicians, lobbyists, special interest groups, teachers and students. Like diet plans, different size portions must be served to sustain education while accordingly anticipating growth. It relies on the balance of teacher salaries and tenure reforms, union benefits and pension fund distribution verses pro-school-choice programs and school voucher systems that affects costs which ultimately dictate curriculum with its intended improved results in the students' overall education.

Why should education matter? Why should schools matter? Why should students matter? Why should Americans citizens matter? Why should anyone anywhere matter? Why it should matter is because this political-socio-economic experiment called democracy is considered by many as about the poorest form of government ever conceived, but it sure beat outs whatever is second best! Anyone can rise above and be successful if they get educated in order to get ahead in America--I personally know because I did it too.

Our country is dependent on the future, the dreams and aspirations of a new generation to build on the past while evolving into the next new challenges. It takes education and the freedom to recognize what America has and is doing within the framework of its founders' U.S. Constitutional laws, not what progressive liberals think should be the laws. That is the best answer to all of the "Whys".  

Voter I.D. - A Bogus Issue

Why are liberals so upset when  a voter photo I.D. is required?

They claim that it burdens all the minorities and poor voters to obtain one since it is difficult since many do not drive cars or have bank accounts.  They further argue that it "disenfranchises" them since it deprives and marginalizes their political voice from the general population. Boy, that sure sounds terrible, almost like a dictatorship without their rights to vote!

Why are the liberals not upset when photo I.D. is required?  

• How about when receiving public assistance for food stamps, housing allowances, disability payments, Medicaid and Social Security benefits?

• Or how about prescription pharmacy drug pick-up, doctor office visit check-in, hospital admission, airport check-in and municipal building access? 

• Or how about for credit cards, check cashing, debit cards, banking transactions, loans, notary service, house-apt rental, vehicle operators license, car rental and equipment rental?

• Or how about for age verification for bars, casinos, adult entertainment clubs, alcohol consumption or purchase, senior discount rates and voter registration?

The obvious key to a picture I.D. is that it offers a highly reliable method to quickly and efficiently guard against voter fraud of ballot duplication, ballot box stuffing, through positive visual authentication at the polling places.