Navigation
SEARCH BOX - USE KEY WORDS, NAMES, OR PHRASES.

866-391-6593

Call For Quote

or Click Link!

  •   Build Your Brand
  •       with KLAS!
CODAmeds®

CODAmeds® Dispensers

Manage pills & supplements

  

 

Entries in Federal Education Programs (3)

Sunday
Jul312016

Drawer Knobs Jobs

Recently I heard my wife and her sister bantering back and forth in a quite lively and active discussion. My initial impression was that they had a lot of information in front of them as they were throwing about alternative ideas.  After pouring some coffee I went into where the debate was going on to find it's all about kitchen drawer handles for her sister's new house. I just sort of chuckled as they both went on about the various choices they saw on the internet site.

As I stepped back out of fray, it suddenly struck me that's how people back in the 1800's shopped. They didn't go into retail stores mainly because they did not have the shops and malls of today. In 1845, Tiffany's Blue Book was the first U.S. mail-order catalog and followed up shortly by Sears and Wards in the United States. Today with the invention of the Internet, a website with close-up snap shots and video clips becomes the more usual way to order merchandise for delivery by mail, although the term "mail order" is called e-commerce or online shopping. 

This twenty-first century internet phenomenon is contrary to jobs building by working in the retail "brick and mortar" stores on main streets all over the country. It now actually focuses more in App driven software on cell phones to further drive online purchasing habits. Our latest generation is millininals who have grown up with laptop games and Facebook accounts all supported in the massive social media realm in cyberspace.  

Nowhere are there real stores to shop; only virtual stores where they play games, talk to friends and go to school. The truely honest reality is retail stores will exist, but they will not need the physical workforce level as in the past years. Let's face it, those 3D goggles with surround vision and stereo sound has brought real-to-life situations and images into everyone's heads. Why go out-of-your-mind crazy running through crowds when you can now do it in the comfort of your home? Hmmn....

Now you ask, what is the point I am raising? It is simple. Young people who do not have an education have no future - that's all people, period.  I speak from experience when I remember when President Lyndon B. Johnson passed the "1965 War on Poverty Program" to help poor people across the United States starting with the VISTA Program, etc. This political Federally funded social engineering has cost $15 Trillion dollars and not moved the needle. In 1965, the poverty rate in this country stood at 14 percent. Now, after untold trillions have been spent fighting poverty, the poverty rate is 14.3 percent. 

After fifty years of a Democrat Poverty Policy run under a combination of Republican and Democrat administrations and just recently under a Democrat President for eight years, nothing has changed yet.

Let's try real change and see what happens with a candidate who carries the peoples' popular vote to see what that will do to shake up the Washington elite---

--otherwise, don't ever bitch or complain again because who cares what you think?--just sit down, pay taxes and shut up!

Friday
Sep202013

Obama's Ding Dong Dumb Down Schools 

"Many employers can attest, as college instructors will too if they're being frank, that  many college graduates can barely construct a coherent paragraph and many have precious little knowledge of the world—the natural world, the social world, the historical world, or the cultural world. That is a tragedy for the graduates, but also for society: Civic life suffers when people have severely limited knowledge of the world to bring to political or moral discussions", states Jonathan Jacobs, Director of the Institute for Criminal Justice Ethics and Chairman at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY.

"To see the effect of these trends, simply ask a few 15-year-olds, 19-year-olds or 22-year-olds some basic, non-tricky questions from non-esoteric knowledge categories (history, biology, current events, literature, geography, mathematics, grammar). See what the responses are. Ask these young people to describe the basic institutions of American government, or how a case makes its way to the Supreme Court or what "habeas corpus" means. The point isn't to embarrass them, but to wake up the rest of us to how little students have been expected to know even about the political and legal order in which they live."

To flesh out to define some problems in the education system, I can speak to this issue from my own personal experience. After starting up three corporations in the Los Angeles, CA area with million of dollars in sales and hiring upwards to one hundred employees, many of them college graduates, I concur with Jonathan Jacobs that a majority had severely limited knowledge of the world and in no small way due to college courses taught by inept, myopic, liberal biased instructors.

I recall, in particular, one painful search for a General Sales Manager. My ideal candidate's specifications were a minimum 4 year college degree, field sales experience, sales training skills, verbal and writing skills and basic business mathematics required. I advertised in the well-read Sunday Los Angeles Times, at the time, San Fernando Valley News, and local newspapers. I also worked with two well-known employment agencies too. I was willing to put the money up to search, locate and identify the right candidate offering a generous pay package and company benefits too. After a weekend newspaper blitz, I would receive over one hundred resumes mailed in per week. You would be amazed on what was sent in as professional letters and resumes. Sad. This search labored on for over four weeks as I culled the names down to a few likely prospects to interview.

As the pick narrowed down to a few final candidates, two MBA's were in that mix too. I laughingly look back as they came in for their call-back interviews. The MBA, by the way, is not a professional designation like a PhD or an MD; when an MBA is after your name, it just looks like  trying too hard to impress people. Their boastful egos certainly preceded their own high opinions of their immense potential value offered with their "M-B-A's".

In the final negotiations both candidates were thoroughly satisfied with my total compensation package; but, both felt that their three letters titles "entitled" them  for the right to ask for a cut of the company profits too as if they were owners. They exhibited total ignorance in that which they had no right to ask for something that did not belong to them. They had up to their point of college graduation no real world, business management-ownership experience - simply put, they never had skin in the game either or experienced real world consequences of investing one's own money with reward-risk outcomes. It all just becomes one more computer simulation model in business school without any real negative consequences with the collegiate advantage to just walk away when the semester is done.

McDonald's burgers, fries & cold drinks.Similiarly, some view fictional hour-long TV dramas as representing a real set of difficulties, offering pat solutions and solving all problems between the opening titles and the closing credits--so it's no surprise to see a 'McDonald's Generation' who demands 'instant gratification' with fast-service, quality food and timely delivery and expects, of course, life to yield the same immediate results too.

What life lesson were they missing? How about the basic primal fear for survival is no game?--to patiently strive further beyond the point of others in order to succeed while knowing the high probability of failure still exists--"It ain't over until the fat lady sings.", as Yogi Berra so elegantly put it.

Coincidently I hired another MBA graduate who measured high in testing, had the sales experience and interviewed well. He eventually revealed miserable leadership skills to motivate the outside sales force and an inability to plan sales efforts or effectively achieve goals. One solid criticism was he proved out to be an ill-equipped thinker to independently originate ideas from his gut level or draw down from past experiences to navigate uncharted areas. Our wide breadth product line was sold to a diverse customer base such as: aerospace, electronics, pharmaceuticals, health care, biomedical, automotive, food processing, warehousing and transportation as well as government and municipalities. There was virtually no limitations on who, what or where which left everything to his imagination, the missing quality of that Sales Manager. Bottom-line, the sales did not grow and as my first sales manager Wes Clemens always said still applies: "Sales talks, bullshit walks."

So, for today's students, "the primary concern shouldn't be how American students rank in international science and math scores (though that is certainly relevant). It is whether the United States can be a prosperous, pluralistic democracy if higher education fails to require students to think, inquire and explain."

Kim Brooks, a graduate of the prestigious Iowa Writers' Workshop at the University of Iowa queried, "I wonder at times, is it even worth it? Do students really need to learn to write?" In Her timely Salon article entitled, "Death to High School English", she certainly addressed the principles to think, inquire and explain. As Kim Brooks mused about that subject she said, "I bounced the question off another friend, Amelia Shapiro, a longtime writing tutor and composition professor who now directs support services at a university in Hawaii."

“I hate that fucking question,” Amelia replies. “I hear it all the time and I hate it. No one asks this question about calculus, but who uses calculus besides math majors? If the question’s going to be asked about writing it should be asked about every subject. Even students who aren’t going to stay in college need to know how to write. We’ve all gotten emails or cover letters where we’ve judged people based on the writing. It’s not an essay but it’s still communication and people fail at it all the time in profound and meaningful ways.”

When Kim asked Amelia why she thinks there’s such resistance to prioritizing and teaching writing, given its numerous applications, given its overlap with critical thinking skills, analytical skills, basic communication skills, she hesitates for a moment, then answers in three words: “It’s not fun.”

[Kim agreed saying] True, but then, teaching (and for that matter, learning) isn’t always fun. Changing my kid’s dirty diapers isn’t fun. Dragging my fat ass onto a treadmill isn’t fun. Helping my grandmother “fix” her computer isn’t fun. Sometimes we do things not because they’re fun but because they’re important."

Jonathan Jacobs says, "The U.S. faces serious challenges; education should be serious and challenging. The cost to America of failing to reverse the trend toward trivializing education will be more than just economic. It will be reflected in social friction, coarsened politics, failed and foolish policies, and a steady decline in the concern to do anything to reverse the rot."

Wednesday
Apr042012

Obama's Fire Sale on Higher Kollage Education

Scopes Monkey Trial 1925 - William Jennings Bryant & Clarence Darrow.  John Scopes was tried and convicted for violating a state law prohibiting the teaching of Darwin's theory of evolution. Bryan served on the prosecution team, and Darrow defended Scopes.

I find it really humorous that Obama used the term "Social Darwinism" to describe the Republican's position on their Ryan budget proposal. 

I challenge Obama to ask any of his scholarly liberals in the general public pool of unwashed blue-collar voters to define what he means.  LOL! ...Fat chance!

Those educated students are products of public schools and are not taught to read, write or study.  They are generally dumbed down with pass/no pass grades along with liberal arts subjects with no emphasis on mathematics, sciences or technologies.  Obama tells them to go to Kollege and he will pick up their tuition.  I ask, "What are they going to study if they are poor students anyway"? and I further ask, "Why bother if they graduate and cannot earn a living even with that learned knowledge"?

In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson signed the "Elementary and Secondary Education Act" considered by many liberals to be the most ambitious effort to raise achievement levels in public schools.  In 2012, forty-seven years later, it has been a dismal failure,

In 2001, President Bush signed the “No Child Left Behind Act” which includes provisions intended to close the student achievement gap (achieve 100 percent student achievement in reading and math by the year 2014), seeks to hold public schools accountable for achieving standards of proficiency, sets standards of excellence for every child, and seeks to place a qualified teacher in every classroom. In 2012, over ten years later, it has been a dismal failure.

So, Obama implies that the Ryan Republican budget proposal is thinly veiled "Social Darwinism" which does not consider the weakest, poorest, sickest members or those middle class people who pay no income taxes are cast aside with no safety nets or social programs to assist them to survive in the American society.  Hence, Obama characterized the Ryan Republican Plan as heartless “dog eat dog” capitalism.

FYI:  "Social Darwinism" 

The term originally was defined under an anthropological hierarchy theory to prove man's transition from apes to human beings. Liberal progressives as far back as Presidents Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson loosely applied under political standards to define "Social Darwinism" as "the survival of the fittest" that is embodied in the science of Eugenics.  It illustrates one sub-standard set in the human species as an inferior race. 

Eugenics is “the study of, or belief in, the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics).” 

This was a science embraced by the Progressive Movement that started around the time of Woodrow Wilson’s presidency. Woodrow Wilson, as President of Princeton University, approved of the practice of Jim Crow laws in the town and as President of the United States introduced Jim Crow laws in the Federal Government. Progressives feared the consequences of racial equality with 45 percent of the negro population illiterate. The idea today that Wilson and his administration would fund abortions for the poor is very plausible.

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S SHAMEFUL PAST

To my great surprise, I found out that it was the Southern Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery.  As Francis Rice, Chairman of The National Black Republican Association (NBRA), has said, “They were the ones who passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. They started the Ku Klux Klan (the terrorist wing of the Democrat party) to lynch and terrorize blacks.”  They fought against the passage of every single civil rights law from the 1800’s through the 1960’s.