Time to Wake Up & Smell the ISIS Arabic Coffee!

To say that I am grossly horrified and absolutely shocked at what is happening in the middle East is an extremely severe understatement that does not even begin to describe my deep anger. Surprisingly my immediate anger is not directed at 14 known terrorist groups operating in the middle East and Africa: ISIS, al-Qaida, Hamas, Palestinian Liberation Front, Muslim Brotherhood, Hizballah, Boko Harum, al-Shabaab, Haqqani Network, Ansar al-Shari'a in Benghazi, al-Nusrah Front and Mujahedin. So who is it?

My initial anger is focused on my own U.S. Federal government and agencies; mainstream media outlets via newspapers, magazines, television, radio and movies; and educational institutions and educators. Where has any real detailed reportage, including truly graphic pictorials, been of these war atrocities in the middle East conflicts? The politically correct, P.C. sanitization of the American public's exposure to bare facts has led many Americans to the gross misunderstandings of why the Jews in Israel are fighting this war--it's for their survival. No thanks to our meddling in the Israeli-Palestinian 'peace process' that in dealing with Hamas, a terrorist militant organization, it obtained a 'state status' by its inclusion due to overt pressures by U.S. negotiators into the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

Our own Secretary of State, John Kerry, had to know about these atrocities and did not release this material because it would have totally undermined American public support of the 'Obama Leading-From-Behind Doctrine.' It states that we must get our tails in up high under our butts and wrapped and curled around our legs as tight as we can while we cowardly scamper off quickly out of the battlefields. Those brave military actions, by the way, encouraged the bold reactions of ISIS terrorists in fighting today since we abandoned Iraq and our allies. 

So then who has ultimately released the truth here? ISIS terrorist's own propaganda machine. Why? It sure shows who's on top winning this war of Allah verses the Infidels. It really gives anybody in the region a sudden, serious moment of the stark reality - "We're really in deep yak doo-doo now!"

Up to 500 prisoners from the minority Yazidi faith are said to have been killed by ISIS ‘death squads’ of jihadi gunmen in recent days. Yazidi women were being raped while their husbands were tortured, slaughtered or beheaded. Little children were given no mercy as they were terrorized in same manner. Some 40 Yazidi children are reported to be among the dead, after being driven from their homes by the brutal Islamist terrorist offensive in northern Iraq.

Yazidi women in House of Parliament protest.

All image sizes have been reduced to minimize the visual shock value of the brutal murderous acts and the impact of terror in the graphics but still convey a picture of the ISIS Islamist terrorist travesties. 

So what was released to world-wide newspapers by the ISIS propaganda machine?

• Sunni tribesmen made deals with ISIS to be left alone but their agreements had collapsed as tribesmen were marched into desert, made to kneel and shot in the head.

• Yazidi prisoners were lined up and executed, their severed heads put on display as a warning to others and graphic photographs of ISIS atrocities. This ISIS terrorist appears smiling as he slits the throat of this young boy to behead him with a hunting knife.

• Punishment for those who fight Allah and his Messengers is to be shot and crucified, head severed or have hands and feet cut off. The chilling images of those victims have now emerged and were released by the group’s expertly managed propaganda machine. 

  

I must say I was quite taken aback by the casualness of the crowds of onlookers surrounding those quite public executions sites. In all of the pictures you will notice that cell phones were out, videos running and pictures snapped as all these heinous crimes were going down. It's as if no one there witnessed any atrocities or even noticed or realized that these were human beings being tortured, mutilated and murdered as they were dying right before their eyes.

So what are those pictures telling us about these tolerent 'religious' Islamist followers, these Muslim people who are now living in Iraq and Syria under the protection of ISIS terrorists with their ultra-extremist 'Wahhabist' Islamic beliefs? (All 9/11 NYC terrorists were Saudia Arabian Wahhbist Muslims.)

It looks like the Mullahs, their teachers, will instruct them in their schools, madrassas, about the Quran, Sharia Laws and the Islamic Caliphate taking over the world too. (See their 'Introduction to the Fatwa' text book - English version for U.S. madrassas) The United States being the 'Big Satan', (Persian شيطان بزرگ Shaytân-e Bozorg), doesn't look like the U.S. is in their future except as an adversary.

Should we even care any more about this region? We can be concerned about campaigns to kill the Muslim terrorists plotting against us and forget about any more delusions of 'nation rebuilding' wars for freedom with our own 'blood and treasure.' However, we should offer countries or people ongoing U.S. aid for humanitarian activities and assistance.  

Otherwise, it's pretty much hopeless in the next one hundred years or so, it doesn't look like it'll be much better off than it is today. The Muslim masses will still be angry, uneducated, poor, hungry, jihadi terrorists fighting for the Islamic Caliphate guided by fanatical Imams.  

Obama Riding Ass Backward on a Camel Hump

It is really ironic that in today's world the United States is precipitously falling further behind other world cultures.  As a leading nation founded upon Judeo-Christian values, many citizens have elected not to embrace any of these core national religious beliefs under the guise to maintain a ubiquitous religious freedom for all. As we proceed further towards attaining this noble utopian ideal we are losing the essence of our own national identity which is especially critical now if we are to survive past the twenty-first century. In looking down road for the guideposts ahead pointing to our future there are signposts that come up that take other nations in divergent directions. Which way is best?  Or, which way is better?  

On December 16, 2013 Saudi Prince Turkl al-Faisal criticized the Obama interim six-month moratorium accord introduced at the World Policy Conference in Monaco that attempts to ensure Tehran won't develop atomic bombs. The Prince further accused the Obama White House of blindsiding Riyadh with its overtures to Iran, Saudia Arabia's primary adversary, by not notifying them about 'secret talks' since last March, 2013 in neighboring Oman. And so now, why did I mention in the beginning about our U.S. Judeo-Christian founding values? It is because they are tremendously significant to our country's core identity around the world which transcends any domestic secular denials of their practice in our governance due to the separation of church and state. By itself, it is the reason there is so much dissention in the middle East now. 

To appreciate the regional dynamics one must understand some basics. Saudi Arabia and other Sunni Gulf nations are supporting the Sunni-dominated rebels in ANTI-JESUS IS NO GOD BANNER hangs over the 2nd Station of the Cross, Via Dolorosa - Old Jerusalem, Israel.Syria, while Shiite Iran is supporting the Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad, which is dominated by Alawites, an offshoot of Shiite Islam. Furthermore, in 1978 Saudia Arabia executed militant Alawite attackers trying to overthrow the House of Saud and take over the Holy City of Mecca and then deported the rest to Europe and elsewhere - no love lost today either. [statistically, 1.6 Bil. Muslims are 80% Sunni and 20% Shiite] All Muslims view the U.S. as an interloper and infidel nation of Christian non-believers to be conquered - the 'big Satan'. With some of these 'ground rules' under your belt now you can go further on in understanding this tangled conundrum of religious Islamic zealotry.         

I believe it is best to look at what is better within sovereign boundaries. A good fence makes good neighbors really applies in this spiritual debate. Why? Because in my analysis of the middle East countries, the twentieth century opened to WW1 retribution with European colonial plots and American interests deciding over permanent postwar territorial divisions without regard to indigenous tribal and religious factions considerations to form territorial borders. It created all the anguish and turmoil we see today in that whole region.

The truth now is that we still painfully have not learned from our mistakes. Past history proves to the Obama administration and others on how bad Progressive Democrat, President Woodrow Wilson botched it all at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. Wilson's odd proclivity of enumerating problems such as his "the fourteen points," apparently being a lofty Princeton College President and Professor, it was his scholastic collegiate approach to framing problems and it was considered way too simplistic by many. It was backroom joke fodder bantered about, then, by Washington politician insiders.

"Woodrow Wilson's grand vision of a new world order rested on a bedrock of profound ignorance. Wilson surrounded himself with 'a staff of advisors,' experts on European economics, geography and ethnicity that included a specialist in Latin American studies, an American Indian historian, a scholar on the Crusades and two Persian linguistics professors." [it was noted, no experts were familiar with the middle East region since the U.S. hadn't gone to war with Turkey] "Despite his staff's size and unquestioned expertise, [albeit, not impressive if 'understanding territorial aspirations', which country wants whose land is an important consideration] Wilson’s selection of the membership of the delegation had assured further future criticism and turmoil since a failure to include any senators or current Republican leaders in the group clearly undercut support for the venture. His thinking on this matter is hard to fathom, especially in light of the outcome of the congressional elections in November 1918. The Republicans had gained a narrow majority in the Senate and Wilson would need the support of his political opponents in order to achieve the necessary two-thirds vote of that body for ratification of a treaty". [looks eerily like the Obama play-book 100 years later]

 And you want to wonder why our Diplomatic Relations are so screwed up?