Navigation
SEARCH BOX - USE KEY WORDS, NAMES, OR PHRASES.

866-391-6593

Call For Quote

or Click Link!

  •   Build Your Brand
  •       with KLAS!
CODAmeds®

CODAmeds® Dispensers

Manage pills & supplements

  

 

Entries in Syrian Conflict (2)

Wednesday
Aug132014

It's Time for ISIS Terrorists to See Allah Close Up!

"Evil succeeds when good people stand by and do nothing."

 

Obama has been consistently engaged in only reactive strategies, pin-prick attacks, as his overall military maneuver on a case by case basis. It's due to his fears of any additional military combat personnel involvement since it's contrary to his ongoing 'troop withdrawal diplomacy' stance. He apparently has no overall master plan for any ambitious or robust Military Decision Making Process (MDMP). However, his policy decisions have their consequences, deadly consequences, and his 'dithering decisions' have offered no relief whatsoever to the worldwide crises. The Islamic State, IS, terrorist barbarism is a glaring example.

The United States Obama foreign policy negotiations under Secretary of StateU.S. INFLUENCE DISAPPEARS IN KERRY'S FEEBLE HANDS.
 John Kerry have stumbled along behind closed doors in the middle East and in Russia.
The 'blame game' of absolving the Obama foreign policy failures are still done by disparaging remarks of former U.S. President George W. Bush actions six years ago. Further blame for not gaining any substantive diplomatic concessions was because of the self-serving behavior of Russia President Vladimir Putin, Iraq Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai and Iran President
Hassan Rouhani. Did Obama delude himself to think that his charming ego would turn those heads of state so much as to change their committed agendas?

Obama's 'veil of ignorance' is now worn thin and tattered, the wagging finger of blame points back onto himself. When will Obama now take responsibility to admit to everyone about his sorrowful performance? Although, I don't think Barack is capable of truthfully ever admitting it even to himself.  

It's a fool's errand to attempt to do something that has no chance of success; so do you think that the United States military should ramp up troops to reenter battle fields in Iraq to fight the IS terrorists? In 2011 the U.S. troops withdrew and hundreds of millions of dollars of equipment was left behind for the Iraqi army like weapons, small arms, ammunition, mortars, Humvies, M1 Abrams tanks, howitzer field artillery and transport trucks of which the IS terrorists stole and exploited to take on battles and hold the territories. They are certainly now well-organized and well-equipped as an ad hoc volunteer militia that mimics a strong military force to fight for the Islamic State.

Isn't also foolish to think that the IS terrorists cannot be beaten either? They do appear to be a formidable standing army by virtue of their very sophisticated U.S. weaponry. But, that weaponry can be their achilles' heel too, the soft chink in their armor. So how? That sophisticated weaponry and vehicles absolutely require highly trained maintenance crews in that desert sand-filled environment. Those captured vehicles and equipment will eventually break down requiring needed maintenance, repairs and parts. More importantly, trained mechanics, diagnostic equipment and tools are mandatory assets in short supply.  

PREDATOR DRONE MISSILESThe Islamic State's present successes are indisputable in the Iraqi and Syrian open deserts areas, but its vulnerability has not been U.S. combat tested there yet. Let's see how their 'crack crews' of Islamic jihadi 'rag-tag' IS terrorists do fending off high altitude U.S. F-18s dropping Jdam 'bunker-buster' bombs, Predator drones with Hell-fire missiles seeking out IS leaders along with Huey helicopters with fully loaded rocket launchers aimed on all of their ground troops, large scale Two U.S. F-18 Jdam Bombs were dropped into a recent terrorist meeting as part of a community clean-up program.weaponry and supply lines feeding them. Now this type of military strategy using air strikes without 'putting boots on the ground' can greatly assist the peoples of Iraq and Syria by decimating the stolen IS weaponry, ordinance cache and methodically thinning out their troops to even out the playing field to beat back the terrorist insurgents. It would then provide valuable current 'intel' into troop movements, insurgent terrorist numbers and for all the geographical battlefield placements. Ultimately, the war proven quality and professionalism of our U.S. Army Logistics Branch are far superior to any IS terrorists--'Always There Always Ready'.  


Saturday
Aug312013

Obama's Wars & Rumours of War

Apparently now, due to Obama running off at the mouth during his Presidential"Did you say 'Red Line' or WHAT action?" Heh, Heh, Heh! campaigning without a teleprompter fired up to spew out pre-written tested thoughts and actions, he discovered his OWN words do have meaning and can carry weight. More like a frightened little boy who discovered matches burn down houses, he rants about a "red line Syria was not to cross or else" and ignited an entire fire storm in the Middle east by playing with deadly matches - missiles and bombs. 

BoBo, Playing with Matches Again? ...Naughty, Naughty!

 

Today, President Barack Obama was referred to as a King, and rightfully so considering his actions. He has been running around the United States Government as if it was his monarchy without any legislative body while treating Congress as if it exists only to rubber stamp royal executive order decrees.

Today, Obama abdicated his throne by throwing back into the lap of Congress his decision for a limited military strike, thereby tying one arm behind the backs of our soldiers to fully engage the enemy amounting to a slap oh the wrist, and seeking congressional authorization to proceed under the war powers act to approve unilateral military actions against Syria even though he has the power to independently act unilaterally with little notice.

Obama has thrown his own decision responsibilities onto the shoulders of congress in order to preserve his poll numbers without political damage, it is classic "leading from behind" tactics. Obama wants an attack on Syria “just strong enough to avoid getting mocked.” It does not advance his cause going to war alone without Obama covering his ass gaining the American people's overall support to fall back on if his "limited actions" fail.  Hey! ...Can you "Blame Bush" now?

Failure Outcome Scenarios:

  • Israel is bombed in retaliation as U.S. ally
  • Iran lobs missiles into Turkey since U.S. uses NATO bases there
  • Egypt attacks Israel
  • Russian Syrian coastal naval base is hit - Obama secretly said no attacks
  • Russia attacks Saudia Arabia
  • al-Assad regime’s stockpile of chemical weapons are  stolen
  • U.S. "Surgical" missile strikes hit innocent civilians, homes & schools
  • Destroyed hidden Chemical weapons arsenals set off huge explosions that immediately kill, contaminate & decimate population centers.
  • Chemical weapons gases waft and blow over adjacent countries

What Do You Call This? - "A Clean Surgical Strike"? This picture has been authenticated based on its contents and other AP reporting, purports to show a fireball from an explosion at a weapons depot set off by rocket attacks that struck government-held districts in the central Syrian city of Homs on Thursday, Aug. 1, 2013.

Obama's congressional action here on Syria is eerily similar during his term as an Illinois State Senator when he attended legislative sessions. When faced with difficult political issues he waffled on decisions, some people determined that Obama's "present" votes were a sign of political weakness or political finagling to con the system. Such votes can help them avoid the political fall-out of voting "no": Obama voted "present" 129 times as a state senator. Although abused, the true intent of a vote of "present" rather than "yes" or "no" votes was a way for lawmakers to voice legitimate opposition due to an issue, not simply just to duck a vote up or down.

Obama now has sentenced literally hundreds, if not thousands, of Syrian people to die as they will been cast out to occupy areas around chemical weapons stockpiles as human shields--like the other men, women and children that Obama was aghast about being killed by sarin nerve gas just weeks ago in Syria. Again, Obama has shown lack of any world experience, leadership skills, proven management techniques and, foremost, judgement. President Obama is present, he is doing on-the-job-training with real-time consequences.  

President Obama has now earned an even more dubious title of "lower than a snake's belly" since people now equate him to a ranking status below President James Buchanan (1857-1861).  I believe that the public in general today are tired of "Amateur Hour" in the White House and are looking for a more seasoned professional that can handle multi-tasking while leading the most powerful country in the world.  It's time to start bringing the U.S. back up to a place of leadership again.

Brief Bio of President James Buchanan:

James Buchanan was the last president born in the 18th century and, at age 65, was the second-oldest man to be elected President at the time. He served from March 4, 1857, to March 4, 1861.  Buchanan stated about the growing schism in the country: "The object of my administration will be to destroy sectional party, North or South, and to restore harmony to the Union under a national and conservative government." On Buchanan's final day as president, March 4, 1861, he remarked to the incoming Lincoln, "If you are as happy in entering the White House as I shall feel on returning to Wheatland [sic., his house outside of Lancaster, Pennsylvania] you are a happy man."

The day before his own death, May 31, 1868, Buchanan predicted that "history will vindicate my memory". Nevertheless, historians criticized Buchanan for his unwillingness or inability to act in the face of secession and stood by witnessing the meltdown of the Union.

In the Historical rankings of United States Presidents of every president from 1789 to 2009 considering presidential achievements, leadership qualities, failures and faults, consistently place Buchanan among the least successful presidents had him ranking last, in 40th place.  He did, however, rank as the first President over a century ago who was likely our first gay president, having remained unmarried during his lifetime and lived with a man who was arguably nick-named back in their day as our "first gay vice president", his room mate, Rufus King.