Obama Welcomes Goodluck in the White House

Goodluck & Barack get agreements.

Obama Foreign Policy

President Goodluck Jonathan of Nigeria and Obama share many things, especially our millions of dollars of aid and trade subsidies. In return Obama gets nothing, except empty promises in meaningless agreements.

This result is quite on par with one of the Obama Foreign Doctrine expectations that any talks are 'all go and no show'--to never get any guarantees or assurances in the end, except flowery Obama speeches. 

#BRINGBACKOURGIRLS Attack on Terrorists 

The Boko Haram want to overthrow the Nigerian government and set up Muslim rule. They have slaughtered over 10,000 Christians since 2009 according to many reports. Boko Haram insurgents who had kidnapped on April 14, 2014 the 276 teenage girls from a Nigerian boarding school, 53 escaped with horror filled stories to tell. So then, the U.S. "leaped into the rear" (not the front per Obama guidelines) to stand in line behind Chad, U.K., China and France. The U.S. had then dispatched eighty soldiers to guard a drone base in Chad that would be flying drones over Nigeria, but no U.S. troops on the ground in Nigeria.

Michelle put on her 'mean' face pout.So Michelle Obama really knows how to "Hash it out" to our enemies too! Those events escalated so much more that the U.S. First Lady Michelle joined forces with Barack to really ratchet up our heavy-hitting military response too.

Now, their Twitter rhetoric screamed out a very bold 'Hashtag', #BringBackOurGirls Twitter attack against the Boko Haram Islamists.

Euuwee...Scary stuff! Tweet! ...Tweet! ...Tweet! 

Don't you think that this will make those mean ole Boko Haram Islamists give the girls back and run for the hills?

The Boko Haram Internet Response: 

Time: 01.00

By "Bring back our army," he means "release all the captured Boko Haram fighters you're holding." There is no contrition or negotiation offered, only their demand to release military prisoners. Where is the fear in their eyes as they quake in their boots over the 'Obama Hashtag#' offensive?

WOW! This certainly looks like the Hashtag# offense didn't work!

Warren-Obama Double-cross Ticket

The 2016 Presidential Race has already left the starting gate with the donkeys running neck and neck around the track. Obama jumps out of the bleachers to trip donkey Hillary down to knock her out of contention--it's race over for Hillary! The crowd goes wild, then goes silent; who's left in the race? Up from behind gallops the dark horse Donkey Warren who comes down to the wire and the crowds are still. They are now all thinking, do we now want to go still further to the left of the left-wing Obama socialist programs?

The behind the scenes deal cut before the Obama first term was that in exchange forIn 2016 Hillary & Bill will settle the score this time. the Clintons lending a hand to boost his chances to win that Obama would do the same for Hillary when her time came up. Behind the scenes, the hatred between the two has grown into irreconcilable contemptuous disdain with little love lost--now enter Senator Elizabeth Warren. Obama has made it no secret that he favors Warren as the politician that closely follows his socialist values for bigger central government.

Campaign finance, the mother's milk of politics, is flowing in with big bucks on Hillary, but all bets are off if all this brewing consternation spills out into mainstream conversation. Up to now, the DNC boasts about party solidarity while describing the RNC as a rag-tag disconnected group with no real candidates yet on the horizon. This upcoming Presidential Election will be the most expensive campaign ever with $1 Billion spent by both sides. So the stakes will be high as well as the expectations to get it right early; time is of the essence to select prospective candidates with a minimum of partisan bloodletting.

It appears that the Democrat machine will be well-financed as Obama flies around the country doing fundraising events. The Campaigner-in-Chief does what he does best as a community organizer, he knows how to panhandle for money anywhere. The real crux is if he pushes his choice with real hardball backroom 'Chicago style' politics he further elevates the rhetoric--let the blood flow into the streets.

This 2016 election season is certainly starting early in this cycle so that candidates risk over-exposure that will bore the public, a real vote killer at the ballot box. After all, the electorate today is a desktop computer, hand-held PDA, cell phone society that prefers tweets, instant messaging, text messaging and emails to talking. All news and events are instantaneously recorded and reported to the world literally within seconds. The age of electronics has turned the electorate into 24/7 cell phone junkies looking for the next high to stimulate their interest, their 'virtual' attention span is shorter which adds to voter burnout. So, their political knowledge distills down to 10 second sound bites between commercials and the crafty, deceitful politicians know how to manipulate those minds-sad. ...Looks like Game Over for the Thinking Voter!

Father Knows Best Reset in 2016 Elections

 ~ Click on Picture to View ~

Time 00.26

As the Presidential possibilities surface as the 2016 Presidential Elections loom, the talk around the water cooler lately is, "How about Mitt Romney?" As much as I hate to admit it, it's a little like another 1950's season of "Father Knows Best" reruns and in this case it's retreads. Robert Young as Jim Anderson is the perfect family man and father. We already know Mitt is a great family man and husband who owns a private equity firm called Bain Capital, which turns around distressed companies. Mitt had his bite at the apple and it's over. Really, it is time for the Republican Party to seek fresh faces and young energy to run the White House, 24/7, Chief Executive position--it's time for new blood, not 'Nick at Nite" reruns or in this case "Mitt at Nite."

This same advice is held out for Governor Jeb Bush and other old guard Republicans who are not up to really fighting hard hitting progressive, liberal candidates of today. Their ideas are 'also-ran' programs as moderate candidates is to just continue the tax and spend mentality of a powerful central government. It is time for tough love for the Republican party and to a transition period for more conservative values and constitutional approaches to shrink the government and its insidious regulations.

This admission by many Conservatives and Republicans, I am sure, is putting a pause into the Democrat plutocrats on whether another retread from the past like Hillary Clinton can run another major race too. After all, she will be 69 years old in 2016 like Reagan was in 1981 in his first term. There were many meetings that are well documented of the POTUS, Reagan, cat-napping during some of the tedious daily staff meetings. Hillary will be no different. Just look at Bill and Hill as they snooze during a ceremony--it's the first time in quite awhile they have slept together! 

The comparison is often made when critics and allies debate whether Hillary has the health to serve out two presidential terms. After she suffered brain damage after falling in December 2012, see ABC News GMA Report, former president Clinton revealed that his wife’s injury “required six months of very serious work to get over,” he said during a question-and-answer session at the Peterson Foundation in Washington. But, Bill Clinton’s timeline appears to differ from official comments from the State Department at the time that she soon bounced right back into work. Who do we believe?

After all, Hillary fainted and hit her head in a fall at home. It incapacitated her for nearly six months which delayed her attendance at the Benghazi Congressional hearings and conduct any state business according to her doctor's orders to reduce stress with complete rest. Let's face the truth, the fact is that the ole girl ain't what she used to be! 

It's Time for more Voter choices in Candidates for 2016!

U.N. Agenda 21 Dictates EPA U.S. Waters Affairs

Under the United Nations Agenda 21 Program or the controversial International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), a collective of local governments and national and regional local government organizations are committed to radical environmental policies to eliminate private property rights. The Green Environmental Initiatives, Greenhouse Gases with Carbon Taxes and restrictive EPA laws have been a looming cloud above the United States democracy for over the past twenty years. 

I should emphasize that U.N. Agenda 21 is designed to guide oversight in 'forced urbanization' to relocation of population centers by simply turning the water off in areas that the Federal planners do not want the people to live. The bureaucrats are currently designing 'downtown renewal' communities across the nation for more concentrated collective densities. 

The Obama administration is now the perfect storm for this cloud to join up and settle over our land. The EPA is to become the premier federal agency for implementing Agenda 21 in the United States. Again, the general public is uneducated and stupid about sophisticated concepts and problems, ready to thoughtlessly vote again. The outlook looks pretty pathetic unless the tide can turn in the next major election cycles.

IT’S TIME TO DITCH THE RULE - EPA 'WATERS OF THE U.S.' ACT

Puddles, ponds, ditches, ephemerals (land that looks like a small stream during heavy rain but isn’t wet most of the time) and isolated wetlands dot the nation’s farmland. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps) on March 25, 2014 issued a proposed rule that would expand its regulatory authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA) to these types of land features and waters, giving the agencies the power to dictate land-use decisions and farming practices in or near them. The rule will make it more difficult to farm or change a farming operation to remain competitive and profitable.

In releasing the new 'waters of the U.S.' proposed rule, EPA (the lead agency on the rule) has said that it is clarifying the scope of the CWA. However, EPA’s “clarification” is also a broad expansion of the types of waters and lands that would be subject to federal permit requirements and limits on farming practices and other land-uses. 

It is vital for agriculture that the proposed rule does not become final or, if that is not possible, substantially changed. Farm Bureau will pursue this goal in the following ways:

Support extending the current 90-day comment period to 180 days to give farmers and ranchers time to review the proposed rule and provide input;

Comment about the impact the proposed rule would have on farms;

Support any efforts in Congress to rein in the federal government’s expansion of control over private land;

Engage in traditional social media campaigns to bring attention to the impacts of the proposed rule on landowners, small businesses and the economy, as well as agriculture.

The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are publishing for public comment a proposed rule defining the scope of waters protected under the Clean Water Act. This is Docket No. EPA-HQ-OW- 2011-0880 in the Federal Register.

CLICK ON DITCH THE RULE FOR MORE ABOUT  HOW TO STOP A FARM CRIPPLING BILL.

Obama Still at It to Dump Internet & U.S. ICANN

The Obama administration has again announced the end to U.S. stewardship of the open Internet; Russia and China will take advantage of the American ICANN surrender too. Authoritarian regimes want to grab control recognizing the 'different modes and methods in Internet management'.--code for a major subversion of the Internet and restriction to freedom of speech. Meanwhile, Obama is stealthly trying to pass his 'Executive Order' on the down-low and bypass congressional oversight once again; it will be far from the 'modest change in policy' that Obama claimed in March, 2014.  Is Obama aware of the major damages?  Of course not, he is again clueless!--How many more times must the public take that silly clueless excuse and just admit he knows what he is doing?        

Sands in an Hourglass."Like sands in the hourglass, so are 'The Days of Our Lives'."--to borrow the line from a popular daytime soap opera introduction. Since 1965, it is one of the longest-running scripted television programs in the world. It is even older than the Internet--my how time flies!

FACTOID: On October 24, 1995 the Federal Networking Council, FNC, unanimously passed a resolution defining the term 'Internet'. This definition was developed in consultation with members of the internet and intellectual property rights communities. RESOLUTION: The Federal Networking Council (FNC) agrees that the following language reflects our definition of the term 'Internet'. It refers to the global information system that -- (i) is logically linked together by a globally unique address space based on the Internet Protocol (IP) or its subsequent extensions/follow-ons; (ii) is able to support communications using the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite or its subsequent extensions/follow-ons, and/or other IP-compatible protocols; and (iii) provides, uses or makes accessible, either publicly or privately, high level services layered on the communications and related infrastructure described herein.

"The Internet has changed much in the three decades since it came into existence. It was conceived in the era of time-sharing, but has survived into the era of personal computers, client-server and peer-to-peer computing, and the network computer. It was designed before LANs existed, but has accommodated that new network technology, as well as the more recent ATM and frame switched services. It was envisioned as supporting a range of functions from file sharing and remote login to resource sharing and collaboration which had spawned electronic mail and more recently the World Wide Web, Internet telephone and Internet television.

"The most pressing question for the future of the Internet is not how the technology will change, but how the process of change and evolution itself will be managed. The architecture of the Internet has always been driven by a core group of designers, but the form of that group has changed as the number of interested parties has grown. With the success of the Internet has come a proliferation of stakeholders - stakeholders now with an economic as well as an intellectual investment in the network. [Those major multi-national stakeholders have taken their suppressive political underpinnings to threaten the global Internet freedom of speech that have been advanced since the beginning by the United States ICANN organization.] 

"We now see, in the debates over control of the domain name space and the form of the next generation IP addresses, a struggle to find the next social structure that will guide the Internet in the future. The form of that structure will be harder to find, given the large number of concerned stakeholders. At the same time, the industry struggles to find the economic rationale for the large investment needed for the future growth, for example to upgrade residential access to a more suitable technology. If the Internet stumbles, it will not be because we lack for technology, vision, or motivation. It will be because we cannot set a direction and march collectively into the future."

Like those 'sands in the hourglass' our Internet freedoms are quickly slipping right between our fingers to be lost forever. With our U.S. Federal Communications Commission, the United Nations, the European Union, the various sovereign nations, partisan coalitions and special interest groups they all have strict regulatory agendas to curb current Internet freedoms. Can they all get along?--Read about the U.N. Security Council...

Look at the ridiculous farse exhibited by the United Nations Security Council, its members are so stacked up against any United States participation. Under the Charter, the Security Council has primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. It has 15 Members, and each Member has one vote. Under the Charter, all Member States are obligated to comply with Council decisions. The Permanent Five members, P5, are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.  Each of the permanent members has power to veto, enabling them to prevent the adoption of any "substantive" draft Council resolution, regardless of the level of international support for the draft. 

All substantive United States' resolutions are null and void by design.--And so after reviewing over 70 years of poor performance of the U.N., do we now give up U.S. control of our Internet and all set a direction to march collectively into the global future?? 

CONTACT YOUR SENATORS & CONGRESSMEN!