Obama's True Marxist Approach

President Obama is a Marxist. Every time Obama has been threatened with being named a Marxist, eyes roll and the counter punches begin. However this time it is incontrovertible; he is a Marxist, but the Marx in question is Chico.  

"Who are you to believe, me or your eyes?", asked Chico Marx in the 1933 comedy movie hit 'Duck Soup'.

As President Obama attempts to convince the electorate he has everything under control, Obama has the egotistical gall to ask, "Who are you going to believe, your viewpoint or what I tell you?" 

All the voters have to do is open their own eyes. Look at all of the pending issues that are still not settled yet during the Obama Presidency: 

• NSA Spying
• Benghazi Terrorist Attack
• National Border Security
• Illegal Aliens
• Immigration Policies
• U.S. Troop & Arms Withdrawals
• Islamic Global Caliphate Threat
• Obamacare
• AP Press records seizure by DOJ
• Foreign Policies failures
• National Debt Budget
• Veterans Administration Malpractices
• IRS Targeting Conservative Groups
• ATF Fast & Furious Gun Running Sting
• Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Program overreach
• XL Oil Pipeline, Coal Mining, Natural Gas Production  

Looking For The Enemy? ...Did You Vote?

POGO - Earth Day 1971 - "We have met the enemy and he is us!"

Just as Pogo clearly states in a famous vintage 1971 poster, "...the enemy is us," it was a cautionary warning about ecology over 43 years ago which said that we all must take personal responsibility for our own earth. It's still true today, but forgotten by many only two generations removed in 2014.

Nearsightedness or myopia is a vision condition in which close objects are seen clearly, but objects farther away appear blurred. As a community organizer, Obama has only laser focused on campaign fundraising for the upcoming midterm elections. Obama can't see any further because national and world affairs have politically overwhelmed him. He barely understands Domestic policy day-to-day issues due to his very limited practical experience in business and government.

Even Obamacare, his ‘touchstone’ achievement is disintegrating before his eyes. As a testimony to his self-aggrandizement for a Presidential legacy was by shoving his shoddy program down people’s throats which only proved an uber-ego disconnect—and with no ‘across-the-aisle’ votes. Obama said it was all 'partisan politics as usual' forgetting to mention the electorate was not informed and the Democrats did not read the bill before the vote.

Admittedly, the mainstream media and press corps have shielded this President during his tenure as President. The cover copy shouts media bias and attacks anyone who dares criticize Obama as dumb. How clear can that be to everyone?

Doesn't everyone now see what is the big problem?--it is us. If we first shoot ourselves in the foot, then would we do it again? ...and so we actually did it again in the last Presidential election cycle. Are we going to do it over again when the world is now spinning out of control under this President's party leadership? It's time to stop the blame, stop beating ourselves up and stop unlimited government spending--let's vote to change Washington in 2014!

Obama Concedes Enrichment - Gives $7 Bil. to Iran

Stop me if you have heard this latest Obama joke on voters, most have not due to Obama's best efforts:

Obama screams for European nations to stop Iran and other Islamist Regimes by "imposing economic sanctions" - So why in the Hell is Obama giving Iranians back billions of dollars if they would just please, please, please talk to John Kerry? --That's not really funny at all!

In 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) first reported that Iran had not declared sensitive enrichment and reprocessing activities. President George W. Bush insisted on 31 August 2006, that "there must be consequences" for Iran's defiance of demands that it stop enriching uranium. He asserted "the world now faces a grave threat from the radical regime in Iran. The Iranian regime arms, funds, and advises Hezbollah. President G.W. Bush passed harsh U.S, and U.N. sanctions to force them to a nuclear agreement. Iran has continually said defiantly it believes Iran has a right to enrich uranium on its soil.

 

 Kerry gives away $7 Billion in U.S. Sanctions to Iran

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry spoke to the media after July, 2014 closed-door nuclear talks on Iran taking place in Vienna. 

Obama Moves Iran Talks so Voters don't see Failures.

"In exchange for agreeing over the weekend to extend nuclear talks until late November [after U.S. Elections], Iran will be given another $2.8 billion in unfrozen assets, the White House told reporters over the weekend [perfect time to drop a bad news story to bury it], after President Barack Obama decided to extend the talks past their July 20, 2014 deadline.

"The United States already returned to Iran $4.2 billion in unfrozen oil assets during the past six months of the interim nuclear deal and has now agreed to provide another $2.8 billion in exchange for an extension in the negotiations."

The United States will give Iran access to another $2.8 billion over the next several months and appears to have conceded to Iran’s demand that it be permitted to domestically enrich uranium, the key component in a nuclear weapon, according to senior Obama administration officials.

White House officials also appeared to admit that U.S. negotiators have told Tehran that they will allow it to preserve some of its domestic enrichment capabilities, something that Congress has opposed.

“As part of the JPOA [Joint Plan of Action] extension, Iran will be allowed access in tranches over the next four months to $2.8 billion from its restricted overseas assets,” a senior administration official told reporters on a conference call over the weekend. “Those assets, which are largely unavailable to Iran, are more than $100 billion.”

These frozen assets have “actually increased” over the last six months due to increased oil revenues flowing into Tehran as a result of sanctions relief provided by the United States."

Is This the New "N" Word?

Language is a collective memory or cultural history so the meaning of words are defined by society. Just as words in English have no meaning to people that don't speak English, the words can have certain meanings in certain sub-cultures or circles.

Anti-racial cartoons in publications.Actually in the Muslim world the "N" word in Arabic is "Nikah". In Arabic it is equivalent to the "F" word, it is a word from the Quran when offensively taken basically means pejoratively "to have sex." The typical Islamist counter-argument states, "Even though this is completely false when silly Christians say that, [the term] "Nikah" is a proper and not offensive word to use." and added, "It is true that "Nikah" could sometimes also refer to sexual intercourse so it does not only have to necessarily mean "to have sex", it could also mean marriage." So in another words, this word does not have a double entendre, double meaning, when uttered or written outside the Quaran? ...Ah yeah, gotcha! So that's words like ass or cock and what sinful act they do together that's mentioned in the Bible that can't possibly be used pejoratively? 

In war torn Iraq the conquering Islamic militants have decreed that it is death to the Christians if they don't convert to Islam, pay a dhimmi tax (Sharia dhimmitude to allow infidels to live), or leave homes to flee insurgent-held areas by the end of July 2014. Christians were estimated to be a scant 5%, 1.2 Million, of the 23 million Iraqi population and have emigrated in mass since the insurgencies began late last year.

According to Abu Faris, a local Christian leader from Mosul, the Islamic State Fighters began marking the Iraqi Christians properties with the Arabic letter "N". The protesters in France show the profane symbol against Christians as they march to denounce it. 

It is reminiscent of the Nazis marking businesses and homes with the "J" word for Juden (Jews) during WW2 in Germany. It marked them as undesirables which eventually identified where to find them for transport to concentration camps for extinction. Where are over six million Holocaust Jews today? Dead.

Muslim Brotherhood

What some people call regular mainstream "Moderate Muslims" it's as if that modifier means being anything different than the "Radical Muslims." That would be significant if they really would be standing up to protest but instead are just quietly standing by while watching their Radical Muslim brothers do harm and create tumult in general, but read on...

We hear a lot of qualifying statements about “moderate Muslims” when “radical Islam” is mentioned. Now, certainly, one can imagine that the majority of Muslims, are most likely people who just want to get on with their lives and that in western countries in particular, many keep a low profile and just live their lives with a low current of religiosity. Like people everywhere, they are trying to get through the day, and not start a revolution or ignite a war. Even so, some are sympathetic to radical concerns or issues, even if they are not entirely seized with passion for the cause. So, their moderate passive attitudes really just feed the heated passions of radical Islamists which just encourages them even further. 

Other Muslims are completely against radicalism, but 'stay on the down low' and don’t make waves. Then, there are the Muslims who become leaders and actually attempt to impress some kind of moderate change on the current situation within Islam. Many of these high-profile moderates or liberal Muslims don’t get as much press as the radicals, but they do exist, and often they live their lives under threat of death from their co-religionists.

So what is the answer? It's obvious, and some will not like it--we either have to co-exist, which is totally unacceptable by the majority of Islamists, or they will be reduced to dust in warfare - literally, unless the Iranians do it first to us. Do you have any ideas? Otherwise, let the ethnic cleansing continue until Islamists have killed every infidel Christian and Jew. So when is it about time to stop fooling ourselves?

An Inconvenient Truth Sees Daylight for Al Gore

V.P. Al Gore invests millions in green energy and for a marketplace for a Cap & Trade Exchange to buy and sell "energy credits."I remember when Al Gore bragged that he created the Internet, a lie.

Al Gore had written in his book, 'An inconvenient Truth,' about all weather phenomena. It's not Global Cooling or Warming, but now labels changed to 'Climate Change.' It seems that weather was unpredictable being either too hot or cold or just in-between, hence 'Climate Change.' That book turned out to be a lie too.

Now Al Gore has created something too, except it is true this time. It is for more of the over-the-top big government regulation by harsh EPA regulations designed to stifle the energy market and drive prices up for users. But what you ask?...

V.P. Al Gore invested tens of millions of dollars in green energy projects not because they work, but the profit potential of 'credits' generated by EPA regulatory controls he can command. So, Al Gore and other wealthy investors establish the marketplace for a Cap & Trade Exchanges to buy and sell  "energy credits." You will be limited to how much electricity you use or save through Federal government mandated allocations, you are literally fined with excess usage levies; but, if you use less, you can sell your unused credits in the Cap & Trade Exchange--Hello, Al Gore? By the way, they say that this practice provides an alternative source to create an additional supply, say what?

The global Cap and Trade Market potential is more frightening. If poorer nations begin 'Cap and Trade' to buy and sell their energy credits, which agency is really monitoring their useage and how can anyone determine there are credits ot not?  What if China buys up all the trade credits from other nations so that they can continue growing manufacturing at current toxic levels and beyond? Even worse, the China scenario implies others like India, Russia will follow who are notorious polluters too.

On July 14, 2014 Brazil's Dilma Rousseff, India's Manmohan Singh, Russia's Vladimir Putin, China's Xi Jinping and South Africa's Jacob Zuma had a BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China & So. Africa) leaders' meeting at the G20 Summit in Russia. They have set up a New Development Bank with it globally funded by a consortium of monies within their partnership to ensure economic stability should the U.S. dollar continue to fluctuate and to step away from dependence on the U.S. dollar and the World Bank which was more concentrated on European countries more than others. This move is ceding more U.S. power by the day to other international world powers.

Eventually the world will be controlled by this United Nations Energy Agency--refer to the U.N. Agenda 21 protocol that is lurking in the background that recently has driven the EPA controls over all water related issues. The only U.S. water regulations before were for our coastal trade ocean lanes, rivers dealing with commerce and transportation and lakes or reservoirs for drinking water. Water controls all aspects of your lives like: urban centers, where you live; food supplies, what you eat; manufacturing hubs, what you make; transportation, how you travel; and population growth, how many allowed. Not enough government in your lives yet?

Sorry Al ...More Inconvenient Truths About Your Lies!