Islam Scrambles the Chicken & Egg Theory

 ~ Big Bang Theory ~

The universe began with a "singularity" that marked the beginning of time

Scientists believe that over 15 billion years ago, a powerful explosion called the "Big Bang" happened. This powerful cosmic explosion set the universe into motion, thrusting matter in all directions. This motion even continues today as the universe is expanding. Scientists are not yet sure if the motion will stop, change direction, or keep going forever. 

• Before the Big Bang explosion happened the entirety of our universe was compressed into the confines of an atomic nucleus. Known as a "singularity," this is the moment before creation when "space and time" did not exist. 

• According to cosmological models that explain our universe, an overwhelming explosion trillions of degrees in temperature on any measurement scale was infinitely dense. This massive explosion created not only fundamental subatomic particles and thus "matter and energy," but "space and time" itself.

The world today is in constant turmoil, but that has been said since "the very beginning of time"--but now even that often quoted time frame is in question too. When, exactly, is the beginning of time?  More important, why is that argument even important today?

Factoid: Cosmology is the science of the origin and development of theParticle Physics - Matter & Radiation interact detecting dynamics.
 universe, the cosmos. Modern astronomy is dominated by the Big Bang theory, which brings together observational astronomy like the deep space Hubble Telescope satellite and particle physics with scientific instruments detecting matter with radiation emissions. This science deals all the time with objects, such as quarks and black holes, that have not been directly detected, visually seen, and yet are the background noise in our vast universe which affects everything around them. Since "God" is not directly detected and yet is affecting everything around Him, does He not then exist too? Hmmn...?  

A "singularity" is an infinitesimal point in space with infinite energy density. [Hope I didn't lose you, LOL.] What it says there, is that our universe didn't have a single, one place where it started from with only one unlimited, self-contained energy source. Quantum mechanics shows that such singularities do not occur in nature, so modern cosmology now has strong reason to think that our universe is just one of an endless number of universes called the "multiverse." The multiverse is infinite and eternal; it had no beginning and will have no end.

So, "Nothing" is notoriously difficult to define. To define it you have to give it some property. But then if it has a property it is not "nothing." So this is an incoherent question unless you define "nothing" as an "empty vacuum." In any case, the multiverse didn't have to come from anything since it always was here. There was no need for a creator because there was no creation.

The "Law of Noncontradiction" states that "something can't be and not be at the same time." It might be better said as "the causality dilemma" or "the chicken & egg theory"--which actually came first?

If we overthrow the "Law of Noncontradiction," literally anything might be true. Black might mean white and hot might mean cold and everything would mean nothing. This is exactly where most modern men and women now live—in the abyss of existentialism or a person's free will to make decisions not knowing right or wrong or good or bad while ultimately accepting individual responsibility; where Joe and Sally might hold world-views that flatly contradict one another—yet both earnestly deny that if one system is right the other must be wrong. This type of thinking seems merely as agreeable and benign, yet it destroys the very concept of truth. 

Many discard the "Law of Noncontradiction" precisely so they can declare truth falsehood and make righteousness evil. Islamic jihadists take advantage of this philosophical soft spot as foolish infidels seek a civil discourse to attain a peaceful coexistence for all in this world, one that will never exist with truly devout Muslims practicing Islam.

It is at this juncture that an important point in our political analysis to recall that the Islamic believers, faithful to the words of their Quran, declared a jihad on all non-Muslims, infidels. This is not a new revelation from the Book of Quran, but to note a condemnation of Muslims with a religious, deep-rooted theological divide that will never have closure ever. Their religious texts and Sharia laws overthrow the Law of Contradiction through their violent Holy War, jihad, to declare truth falsehoods and make righteousness evil.

Our United States leaders must stand up against these radical Islamic fanatics, otherwise accept death or dhimmitude. Dhimmitude is an entire integrated system, based on Islamic theology. It is the taxing of non-Muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence and as a coercive means of converting conquered Infidel remnants to Islam.

It's "Islamism" that's the Problem, Not "Islam!"

Today in 2015, we must change the pejorative definition of the "Radical Islamic Terrorists" to "Islamists" and remove the derogatory stain of "Radical Terrorists" label from the true believers name of "Islam" for all "Muslims" in their "Islamic" religion which interprets their faith peacefully as it applies in today's world.

The "Radical Islamist Terrorists" are who believe in "Islamism" and not in "Islam." They are the hate-filled followers, "Islamists," against all non-believers, the "Infidels."

FACTOID: "An "ism" by definition is a sect or cult that follows a worship and veneration of a religious dogma or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true. In the case of "Islamism" the teaching in the Queran is interpreted in the seventh century tenets instead of the twenty-first century precepts defining specific behavior and thoughts for today's time--this is a BIG DEAL if you have studied either the Islamic Queran or Christian Bible, which share some common scriptural genealogy and narratives.  

An Important Definition: An Arabic word only has one root. The root word for Islam is “al-Silm,” which means “submission” or “surrender.” There is no disagreement about this among Islamic scholars. al-Silm (submission) does not mean the same thing as al-Salaam (peace), otherwise they would be the same word.   

Submission and peace can be very different concepts, even if a form of peace is often brought about through forcing others into submission.  As the modern-day Islamic scholar, Ibrahim Sulaiman, puts it, "Jihad is not inhumane, despite its necessary violence and bloodshed, its ultimate desire is peace which is protected and enhanced by the rule of law."

In truth, the Quran not only calls Muslims to submit to Allah, it also commands them to subdue people of other religions until they are in a full state of submission to Islamic rule.  This has inspired the aggressive history of Islam and its success in conquering other cultures.

To understand the Islam and Christendom divide: 

• The Quran and Bible possess many similarities as the holy scriptures of Islam and Christianity, respectively. They consist of narratives, teachings, poetry, and rebuking. Many narratives contain the same basic events and figures. They both teach the creation of the world by a single almighty, omniscient God who commands humans to follow the morality set out for them. [NOTE: They both believe a "single almighty", but the road rapidly diverges as Jesus Christ enters into any theological discussions. The similar narratives and teachings followed from scriptural rebuking have been reinterpreted from a modern Christianity view into the lessons learned rather than dwelling on the strict literal punitive excesses meted out scripturally for retribution. Radical Islamism strictly follows them of what have become edicts within ancient Sharia Laws which are by prevailing standards excessively intolerable, repressive, physically abusive or deadly to individuals.]

University of Southern California Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement

Our mission at the Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement is to promote dialogue, understanding and grassroots, congregational and academic partnerships among the oldest and the newest of the Abrahamic faiths while generating a contemporary understanding in this understudied area and creating new tools for interfaith communities locally, nationally and beyond.

The following publication at the USC Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement certainly brings the scriptural passages of the Queran into sharper focus. It is three Islam scholars sharing similar translations of the Surahs in the Quran that shows the unrelenting Muslim view in the terms of their ideas of "peace" as only "submission" from infidels before it is achieved. This result, by itself, is never going to ever happen which only fuels further aggressions in pursuit of the Muslim dreams of world domination through violence.

Translations of the Qur'an, Surah 9:

AL-TAWBA (REPENTANCE, DISPENSATION) -  .009.003

ABDULLAH YUSUF ALI: The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! 

MUHAMMAD PICKTHAL: And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they! 

ZAID SHAKIR: And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!

• Muslims believe God dictated every word of the Quran and that God has protected the Quran from any possible human mistakes. The Quran, therefore, is perfect in every way as God is perfect. [NOTE: If any text in the Quran is shared with the Bible where all Christians believe it was written by humans through divine inspiration then how can every word be solely dictated by God without any humanly intervention?] 

• Most Muslims believe the Quran is applicable to every person regardless of context. [NOTE: This inclusive dictate for everyone may have been seen as a logical axiom for a small geographical region in the seventh century, but not in the known world today. How can any contemporary logical thinker state that 1.3 billion Muslims can even control, much less convert over 7.0 Billion people spread around in the world?--this is simply nonsense as global-wide politics and other religions today crushes this wishful hyperbole.]

• Christians believe the Bible is completely true, but in a different way. The Bible is the record of God’s revelation to the Jews and through Jesus. It is written by humans together with God through a process called Divine Inspiration.

It may be argued that similarities between the two texts are only superficial in nature. But in the Shakespearean soliloquy by Hamlet, "There's the rub." Hamlet muses about the misplaced irony between what is believed and what is actually true. So any divergent interpretations of scripture brings with it the underlying message of the text, and it is there that the interpreters will find systemic differences--it is this basis in fact about "literal" readings from any scripture written in another time and place in history that keeps those believers stuck in the past and condemning others as blasphemous demagogues who cannot accept religious text or Sharia Laws verbatim like stoning to death, girl's genital mutilation, whipping, beheading, limb amputation, no women's civil rights, etc. Tragically, the believers in "Islamism" become so crazed with hatred of other non-believers or atheists they will torture or kill them without hesitation or conscience.

Radical Islamism is a world-wide problem. Whether they're standing armies, renegade terrorist gangs, sleeper cells or individuals, they are not people who are doing singular terrorist acts by themselves. The problem is much bigger than defining any of these as just separate events which have nothing to do with Islam--the word "Islamism" does explain them ideally and they're perfected by their larger universal core beliefs shared via the Internet, in Madrassas and Mosques.

Until Obama and our Homeland Security identify them as a global world-wide reach
 of "Radical Terrorists of Islamism" no one can conduct any domestic criminal profiling to track them down.

Homeland Security experts say that only 10% of Muslims are radicals, which does sound manageable. If you do the math, there are 1.3 Billion Muslim followers worldwide, 10% are 130 Million terrorists who hate 320 Million Americans.

As of Feb. 24, 2014 Former U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel reported a troop strength in a current size of 520,000 active duty soldiers--and that is just for starters fighting the huge threat as we should begin sending out terrorism attack teams to seek, locate and kill them wherever they live too. Islamists declared a "Jihad!"--We'll just call it a "War!"

A "Head On" View of ISIS

The Queen of Hearts screamed, "Off with their heads!" So is the Alice in Wonderland Queen's rampage driven more by her passionate uncontrolled anger or rather than from an arrogant omnipotent madness? How does it relate to the Middle East crisis? Unlike the Queen who angrily blows off steam, the Islamic State deliberately conducts planned beheading to incite more regional sectarian volatility. Its omniscient 'God-ordained' jihadi attacks encourage hatred and terror while inciting fear into anyone who challenges them.

For twenty something year old college students who were born a little before the 2001 9/11 NYC terrorist attack were five years olds, certainly too young to remember the biggest terrorist attack on American soil. It had left a lasting emotional and financial scar to many adults, but not those young kids that couldn't remember. Today they are college students who depend on their liberal, left-wing teachers, socialist professors and activist lecturers to recall past facts and present history with footnotes to educate young minds. Sadly, it exploits their ignorance of true U.S. patriotic values while allowing unethical, political agendas to then 'color' history taught--'brainwashed' is a better description. 

The actual carnage and deaths on the sands in the Middle East are not all the human tragedy. It woefully resides within the young minds of our American college students. A recent 2014 Harvard University study revealed shocking off-the-rails views indicating a true lack of any knowledge of U.S. or world history. Thanks to our liberal curriculum from grade school through high school and beyond core subjects, emphasis no longer includes learning about United States history, social studies or civics. It does include a global understanding of how wrong headed American ideals and Constitutional governance lead to wrongfully destroying the ecology of the whole planet and the economies of all its people. Of course, somehow greater redistribution of U.S. resources and wealth are to be shared by all poorer nations too.

An ISIS Muslim with Fence Heads.The uneducated Harvard student citizenry in the study attempted to explain the dynamics of the United States and ISIS roles in the world as they argued there was moral equivalence. While misunderstanding underlying facts, nothing could be farther from the truth as the stark reality of the brutal, ruthless actions by ISIS cannot be equated to U.S. military actions which closely follow the Geneva Conventions for wartime activities. Since ISIS is not recognized either as a country or a standing army it cannot sign the Geneva accords so they're outside the realm of U.N. Law in the World International Court of Justice, ICJ, in the Hague, Netherlands. ISIS may not be a JV team but is still a free agent able to professionally play on anyones' courts under its own set of open barbaric rules.

The Harvard students further blame the United States for how the Middle East has turned into such a volatile region today. However, these college students are totally bereft of biblical perspective due to many who have never read the bible. As a historical religious compendium, the anthologies contained present people, places and events that explain what transpired over the centuries in the Middle East.

In understanding the birth of Islam in 609 CE, God through the angel Jibril (Gabriel) talked to Muhammad who adopted beliefs and tenets from the torah and bible to include into the Quran's major narratives recounted in the Jewish and Christian scriptures. It summarizes some, dwells at length on others and, in some cases, presents alternative accounts and interpretations of events. This pivotal revelation of an interreligious amalgam of beliefs obviously shaped the core of Islam through the Quran, the only revealed book according to Muhammad that has been protected by God from distortion or corruption. How many Harvard students know that Jews' and Gentiles' scriptures were the basis for Islam?

This region of the world is steeped in long traditions, multicultural diversity, and includes the three major religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam that claim this area as the cradle of their religions. The ideological differences, dissensions and discords have existed as long as any Theo-political zeal has existed to control peoples. The Muslims have certainly expressed a militant posture to conquer and rule the world under Sharia Law over the centuries. So do any of those Harvard students really understand Islamic history? I highly doubt many Harvard students are aware of even the facts I have mentioned here or have any clue and instead just bark back liberal TV soundbites.

Forgetaboutit: Islam Terrorists want No Peace!

 

The Islamic State is ascendant with burgeoning attacks and voracious killings of Christians and non-Muslims to terrorize the middle East while also threatening the United States too. Nearly two years of valuable time was idled with inaction and empty words by President Obama which has allowed the Islamic State to gain their strength and influence since his campaign rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin on November 1, 2012 where he declared, "al Qaeda is on the run and Osama Bin Laden is dead!" 

U.S. Congressman Eliot Engel (NY-D) the ranking minority member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee stated recently, "We have bad choices and the worst is doing nothing." His highly critical rhetoric is adding to the growing impatient voices of bi-partisan members of Congress that President Obama should seek Congressional approval for forceful military action against the Islamic State threat. Congressman Engel suggests some "boots on the ground" in order to crush the Islamic State to stem the violence while preserving integral infrastructures such as dams, power plants and roads too.

As victims of a broken ideology that is not a religion of peace, Muslim followers simply despise and curse other religions and unbelievers. Imams force a burden of guilt, a religious duty, into their culture onto Muslims who then compulsively seek to convert unbelievers or subject them to live under Sharia Law paying a dhimmitude tax or kill them. Jihadists, who struggle to be a good Muslims or believers as warriors for Islam while fighting to their own deaths are all promised an ultimate reward of seventy-five virgins waiting for them in heaven from Allah.

'Coexistence' will only happen when the radical Islamic State Caliphate is destroyed and a more secular Muslim population cools down the rhetoric and bellicose saber rattling. Still, they will be using the basic Islamic religious pejorative slur of 'infidel' for Jews, Christians and unbelievers. 

'Peace' will never happen within the literal context ever. Instead, it will be about 'getting along to get by' because the enormous Muslim population will not ever relent in its solemn duty to convert unbelievers to Islam; "There are no other Gods except Allah!"

Obama "Wouldn't Rule Out Anything" in Iraq

On June 14, 2014 the Washington Post reported that President Obama said, "It is now clear Iraq will need help from the United States as the situation there deteriorates," adding that he "wouldn’t 'rule out anything,' including drone strikes and air strikes, but not ground troops."

If the Commander & Chief stays his historical ideological course, the Islamic Militants' Caliphate should be firmly established and spreading throughout the Middle Eastern region. Sharia law will flourish and grow to prosper as the United States shrinks impotently into a shriveled, sniveling United Nations member cowering in a corner with others under the fears of future domestic 9/11 style attacks.

So how can one arrive at such a dismal conclusion? Easy. Obama said, "I would not rule out anything"--and so Obama does nothing about 'anything!'