Obama's Terrorist Plan: Nothing! - Just B.S.

Have you read between the front page news lines lately?--the real stories exposed through daily news leaks as they drip, drip, drip into a massive pool of undeniably chilling, revealing facts?

• ISIS stands for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria; but ISIL stands for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Which is it?

Why did President Obama and the White House change the name of ISIS, the terrorist group, to ISIL while others still call it ISIS?

Simply put, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the head of the ISIL terrorist organization felt ISIS was not an all-inclusive name for their non-statehood group; so, ISIL included the undefined region around Syria which is historically referred to as the Levant (an archaic French phrase for the “lands of the rising sun”), including modern-day Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine and Jordan. Importantly, it is an affirmation of submission by any Infidels to recognize the Islamist Terrorist group's claim as legitimate of their supreme authority, as a Caliphate, governing over all the territories of Israel and the adjoining lands comprising all Muslim territories--it is now Obama bowing down to recognize Islamic authority again.

• Obama's policy is to not name ISIL or other factions as "Islamist terrorists" or "radical followers of Islam" instead focusing on "violent extremism" with "enemy combatants" or "armed insurgents" or other ambiguous names.   

In 2009, Fort Hood, Texas U.S. Army base shootings Nidal Malik Hasan, a U.S. Army major, psychiatrist and Muslim, during all of the shootings shouted, "Allah Akbar!" while he fatally shot 13 people while involved in the act of "workplace violence." 

In September, 2014 Jah’Keem Yisrael, a Muslim whose Facebook page was filled with criticism of American culture and dire warnings for those who do not follow that religion beheaded a co-worker while screaming, "Allah Akbar!," at a food processing company in Oklahoma. He recently had been fired and management declined to say if his religious actions were cause for dismissal. F.B.I. officials said, “So far, there is no nexus to terrorism we are aware of.”--another "workplace violence" case for sure?

In December, 2014 hostage siege at the Lindt Chocolate shop in  Sydney, Australia it was not a "radical Islamist" but Man Haron Monis, a Muslim, who was an "armed robber" who also wore a black headband with Arabic writing and shouting, "Allah Akbar!" while holding a flag saying, “There is no God but Allah; Mohammed is the Messenger of Allah,” a statement of Islamic faith that appears on the flag of extremist group ISIS as his shooting ended with two dead hostages and the "armed robber"--more "workplace violence?"

In January, 2015 a twenty-four year old Jordanian pilot, Muath al-Kaseasbeh, was burned inside a cage to the cheers of "Allah Akbar!" and loud Islamic chants.

• Christians and Jews alike are not recognized as target groups by the Obama White House. 

In January, 2015 in France the Charlie Hebdo newspaper offices were attacked by Cherif and Said Kouachi, two Islamist terrorist brothers who murdered the cartoonists for drawing editorial cartoons critically depicting Muhammad that they said blasphemed the Prophet Muhammad. The gunmen were shouting "We have avenged the Prophet Muhammad" and "God is Great" in Arabic while calling out the names of the journalists. Another terrorist, Amedy Coulibaly, took over a Jewish kosher supermarket while killing four Jewish hostages during an attempted exchange to allow the Kouachi brothers surrounded by police to go free, but instead police killed all the terrorists. In total 12 people were killed in the attack on the Charlie Hebdo offices attack: eight journalists, two police officers, a caretaker and a visitor--more "workplace violence" here?

On February 15, 2015 twenty-one civilian Egyptian oil field workers who were Coptic Christians were beheaded just for their professed Christian beliefs by ISIS in Libya. Obama referred to them as Egyptian nationals working in Libyan refineries. 

On February 16, 2015 forty-five members of the Iraqi security forces were burned alive in cages by ISIS in the western town in Iraq, al-Baghdadi. Then, ISIS took another one hundred people in the town to butcher by beheading, dismembering or crucifying them too. 

On February 17, 2015 ISIS has gone beyond any respect of individual rights and the sanctity of life of infidels. Iraq Ambassador Mohamed Alhakim claimed that dozens of bodies with surgical incisions and missing body parts have been found in shallow mass graves near ISIS stronghold Mosul over the past few weeks. ISIS runs an extensive organ trafficking system from a hospital in Mosul. It has been reported that they are killing doctors and medical professionals who do not participate in the abhorrent practice of cannibalizing human beings for body organs for sale. They literally eviscerate the human carcase, toss the corpse into a mass grave and sell body their parts to finance ISIS. 

On February 18, 2015 President Obama made his feckless protest speech while his U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf, had pointed to jobs as a counter-ISIS strategy...Are you guys kidding??--Where are the U.S. ground troops to kill ISIS?

President Obama further whined about prejudice in the United States society against Muslims and how everyone must make them feel welcome here. Then, he went off on another tangent about how it's a generational struggle for everyone to work at changing the hearts and minds of the young people here and around the world. Obama does not mention all of the Mullahs, teachers in their Madrassas or religious schools, feverishly spewing out their veiled, hatred-filled lessons against infidels while perpetuating Islamist terrorism. Where are the guns and bombs for our war partners in the region?

Obama then alluded to how all countries should work toward democratic governments that are not corrupt and where hand-outs instead of bribes will lead everyone out of poverty.  How about the boots on the ground?-- not to win the hearts or for any nation building, just to bomb, shoot and kill ISIS and then leave. Period! 

It's "Islamism" that's the Problem, Not "Islam!"

Today in 2015, we must change the pejorative definition of the "Radical Islamic Terrorists" to "Islamists" and remove the derogatory stain of "Radical Terrorists" label from the true believers name of "Islam" for all "Muslims" in their "Islamic" religion which interprets their faith peacefully as it applies in today's world.

The "Radical Islamist Terrorists" are who believe in "Islamism" and not in "Islam." They are the hate-filled followers, "Islamists," against all non-believers, the "Infidels."

FACTOID: "An "ism" by definition is a sect or cult that follows a worship and veneration of a religious dogma or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true. In the case of "Islamism" the teaching in the Queran is interpreted in the seventh century tenets instead of the twenty-first century precepts defining specific behavior and thoughts for today's time--this is a BIG DEAL if you have studied either the Islamic Queran or Christian Bible, which share some common scriptural genealogy and narratives.  

An Important Definition: An Arabic word only has one root. The root word for Islam is “al-Silm,” which means “submission” or “surrender.” There is no disagreement about this among Islamic scholars. al-Silm (submission) does not mean the same thing as al-Salaam (peace), otherwise they would be the same word.   

Submission and peace can be very different concepts, even if a form of peace is often brought about through forcing others into submission.  As the modern-day Islamic scholar, Ibrahim Sulaiman, puts it, "Jihad is not inhumane, despite its necessary violence and bloodshed, its ultimate desire is peace which is protected and enhanced by the rule of law."

In truth, the Quran not only calls Muslims to submit to Allah, it also commands them to subdue people of other religions until they are in a full state of submission to Islamic rule.  This has inspired the aggressive history of Islam and its success in conquering other cultures.

To understand the Islam and Christendom divide: 

• The Quran and Bible possess many similarities as the holy scriptures of Islam and Christianity, respectively. They consist of narratives, teachings, poetry, and rebuking. Many narratives contain the same basic events and figures. They both teach the creation of the world by a single almighty, omniscient God who commands humans to follow the morality set out for them. [NOTE: They both believe a "single almighty", but the road rapidly diverges as Jesus Christ enters into any theological discussions. The similar narratives and teachings followed from scriptural rebuking have been reinterpreted from a modern Christianity view into the lessons learned rather than dwelling on the strict literal punitive excesses meted out scripturally for retribution. Radical Islamism strictly follows them of what have become edicts within ancient Sharia Laws which are by prevailing standards excessively intolerable, repressive, physically abusive or deadly to individuals.]

University of Southern California Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement

Our mission at the Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement is to promote dialogue, understanding and grassroots, congregational and academic partnerships among the oldest and the newest of the Abrahamic faiths while generating a contemporary understanding in this understudied area and creating new tools for interfaith communities locally, nationally and beyond.

The following publication at the USC Center for Muslim-Jewish Engagement certainly brings the scriptural passages of the Queran into sharper focus. It is three Islam scholars sharing similar translations of the Surahs in the Quran that shows the unrelenting Muslim view in the terms of their ideas of "peace" as only "submission" from infidels before it is achieved. This result, by itself, is never going to ever happen which only fuels further aggressions in pursuit of the Muslim dreams of world domination through violence.

Translations of the Qur'an, Surah 9:

AL-TAWBA (REPENTANCE, DISPENSATION) -  .009.003

ABDULLAH YUSUF ALI: The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! 

MUHAMMAD PICKTHAL: And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they! 

ZAID SHAKIR: And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!

• Muslims believe God dictated every word of the Quran and that God has protected the Quran from any possible human mistakes. The Quran, therefore, is perfect in every way as God is perfect. [NOTE: If any text in the Quran is shared with the Bible where all Christians believe it was written by humans through divine inspiration then how can every word be solely dictated by God without any humanly intervention?] 

• Most Muslims believe the Quran is applicable to every person regardless of context. [NOTE: This inclusive dictate for everyone may have been seen as a logical axiom for a small geographical region in the seventh century, but not in the known world today. How can any contemporary logical thinker state that 1.3 billion Muslims can even control, much less convert over 7.0 Billion people spread around in the world?--this is simply nonsense as global-wide politics and other religions today crushes this wishful hyperbole.]

• Christians believe the Bible is completely true, but in a different way. The Bible is the record of God’s revelation to the Jews and through Jesus. It is written by humans together with God through a process called Divine Inspiration.

It may be argued that similarities between the two texts are only superficial in nature. But in the Shakespearean soliloquy by Hamlet, "There's the rub." Hamlet muses about the misplaced irony between what is believed and what is actually true. So any divergent interpretations of scripture brings with it the underlying message of the text, and it is there that the interpreters will find systemic differences--it is this basis in fact about "literal" readings from any scripture written in another time and place in history that keeps those believers stuck in the past and condemning others as blasphemous demagogues who cannot accept religious text or Sharia Laws verbatim like stoning to death, girl's genital mutilation, whipping, beheading, limb amputation, no women's civil rights, etc. Tragically, the believers in "Islamism" become so crazed with hatred of other non-believers or atheists they will torture or kill them without hesitation or conscience.

Radical Islamism is a world-wide problem. Whether they're standing armies, renegade terrorist gangs, sleeper cells or individuals, they are not people who are doing singular terrorist acts by themselves. The problem is much bigger than defining any of these as just separate events which have nothing to do with Islam--the word "Islamism" does explain them ideally and they're perfected by their larger universal core beliefs shared via the Internet, in Madrassas and Mosques.

Until Obama and our Homeland Security identify them as a global world-wide reach
 of "Radical Terrorists of Islamism" no one can conduct any domestic criminal profiling to track them down.

Homeland Security experts say that only 10% of Muslims are radicals, which does sound manageable. If you do the math, there are 1.3 Billion Muslim followers worldwide, 10% are 130 Million terrorists who hate 320 Million Americans.

As of Feb. 24, 2014 Former U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel reported a troop strength in a current size of 520,000 active duty soldiers--and that is just for starters fighting the huge threat as we should begin sending out terrorism attack teams to seek, locate and kill them wherever they live too. Islamists declared a "Jihad!"--We'll just call it a "War!"

Forgetaboutit: Islam Terrorists want No Peace!

 

The Islamic State is ascendant with burgeoning attacks and voracious killings of Christians and non-Muslims to terrorize the middle East while also threatening the United States too. Nearly two years of valuable time was idled with inaction and empty words by President Obama which has allowed the Islamic State to gain their strength and influence since his campaign rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin on November 1, 2012 where he declared, "al Qaeda is on the run and Osama Bin Laden is dead!" 

U.S. Congressman Eliot Engel (NY-D) the ranking minority member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee stated recently, "We have bad choices and the worst is doing nothing." His highly critical rhetoric is adding to the growing impatient voices of bi-partisan members of Congress that President Obama should seek Congressional approval for forceful military action against the Islamic State threat. Congressman Engel suggests some "boots on the ground" in order to crush the Islamic State to stem the violence while preserving integral infrastructures such as dams, power plants and roads too.

As victims of a broken ideology that is not a religion of peace, Muslim followers simply despise and curse other religions and unbelievers. Imams force a burden of guilt, a religious duty, into their culture onto Muslims who then compulsively seek to convert unbelievers or subject them to live under Sharia Law paying a dhimmitude tax or kill them. Jihadists, who struggle to be a good Muslims or believers as warriors for Islam while fighting to their own deaths are all promised an ultimate reward of seventy-five virgins waiting for them in heaven from Allah.

'Coexistence' will only happen when the radical Islamic State Caliphate is destroyed and a more secular Muslim population cools down the rhetoric and bellicose saber rattling. Still, they will be using the basic Islamic religious pejorative slur of 'infidel' for Jews, Christians and unbelievers. 

'Peace' will never happen within the literal context ever. Instead, it will be about 'getting along to get by' because the enormous Muslim population will not ever relent in its solemn duty to convert unbelievers to Islam; "There are no other Gods except Allah!"

The Obama War on Terror Doctrine

Meaningful political discourse becomes a debate of words rather than substance as Obama argues semantics, which historically is his game of choice, so that issues cannot be discussed as the clock runs out, witness past Obama debates.

Cindy Crowley interferes with Debate regulations and rules.The Romney debate claim that Obama never said an "act of terror" was behind the Benghazi murders became a semantics argument. President Obama angrily looked over at Candy Crowley, the Town Hall moderator, and barked an order, "Candy, get the transcript!". Candy Crowley jumped to and quickly found a document and then interrupted the Presidential condidates' heated exchange to "fact check" for the President that he had said it, while adding about two weeks later it was indeed called a "terrorist attack" as Romney said too. Obama loudly called out, "Can you say that a little louder, Candy?", demanding Candy to speak up again and thereby avoided being put in a position of attacking his opponent to look mean spirited to maintain his "likeability poll percentage".  It hit me on how did Obama think he could even access a transcript to use in his debate? Then, Candy acted as she already knew her mark and pulled out that rose garden transcript on cue from her podium for the quick read.

A small applause broke out after Candy Crowley read the transcript, loudly from Michelle Obama and a few supporters too.  I never heard any applause from anyone else during the debate until the end.  I guess the request for the applause decorum rules went out the window along with the moderator comments butting in too.

The next day on CNN Candy said she had erred as Romney was “right in the main” but “picked the wrong word.”  She was not "neutral" and her retraction was too little, too late since many debate viewers would never hear it. Candy carried over Obama to clinch a win.

What Obama supporters are now saying is Romney wrongly stated that Obama never said "a terrorist attack" when he indeed called it. A video on the day after in the rose garden shows Obama mentioned "act of terror" in a general sense of world problems.  But Romney was right, implying there was no direct call out for the event as a "planned terrorist attack" and instead Obama later said "Libya was a protest caused by a video".

The fact still remains that Obama's Rose Garden words require some tortured logic to be considered Obama's declaration of terrorism at Benghazi.  Afterwards, Obama wouldn't even call it "terrorism" and blamed an anti-Muslim video when interviewed by The View women nearly 2 weeks after the murders while Susan Rice, Assistant Sec. of State, and Jay Carney, White House Secretary, repeated the mantra on all of the T.V. news outlets.  The next day at the UN all he could point as the cause of the violence was a Youtube  anti-Muslim video that virtually nobody in the Middle East had seen.

Obama lied to us at this town hall debate by parsing his rose garden speech and subsequent interviews leading people away from asking why our defenses were let down under The Obama War on Terror Doctrine: "Bin laden is dead, Kadafi is gone and the War of Terror is over."

The consensus of many observers concluded the debate performance was highly charged. Obama stopped his hemorrhaging after the first debate; but, according to his handlers, he did not have an appreciable net gain of voters, about nil. 

Romney actually won on personal issues while the debate points overall were judged by appearances as even. This is an important distinction since the Romney-Ryan budget plan, taxes and deficits, energy independence and Jobs with household income were Romney's strengths verses Obama's weak answers.

Romney, however, was the real winner from this debate since he will win the 2012 Presidential Election.

~  REMEMBER... 

VOTE EARLY - Nov 6, 2012!  ~

ROMNEY - RYAN